AI Article Synopsis

  • Targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest was studied to see if a lower temperature (33 °C) versus normal temperature (normothermia) leads to better outcomes, particularly based on how quickly the target temperature is reached.
  • In a post-hoc analysis of the TTM-2 trial involving 1592 patients, there was no significant difference in mortality or functional outcomes between those who achieved hypothermia fastest and those who remained at normothermia.
  • The study concluded that the time taken to reach hypothermia does not significantly affect the effectiveness of TTM of 33 °C compared to maintaining normothermia and treating fever.

Article Abstract

Background: Targeted temperature management (TTM) is recommended following cardiac arrest; however, time to target temperature varies in clinical practice. We hypothesised the effects of a target temperature of 33 °C when compared to normothermia would differ based on average time to hypothermia and those patients achieving hypothermia fastest would have more favorable outcomes.

Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the TTM-2 trial, patients after out of hospital cardiac arrest were randomized to targeted hypothermia (33 °C), followed by controlled re-warming, or normothermia with early treatment of fever (body temperature, ≥ 37.8 °C). The average temperature at 4 h (240 min) after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was calculated for participating sites. Primary outcome was death from any cause at 6 months. Secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at 6 months (score of 4-6 on modified Rankin scale).

Results: A total of 1592 participants were evaluated for the primary outcome. We found no evidence of heterogeneity of intervention effect based on the average time to target temperature on mortality (p = 0.17). Of patients allocated to hypothermia at the fastest sites, 71 of 145 (49%) had died compared to 68 of 148 (46%) of the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.07; 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.36). Poor functional outcome was reported in 74/144 (51%) patients in the hypothermia group, and 75/147 (51%) patients in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia 1.01 (95% CI 0.80-1.26).

Conclusions: Using a hospital's average time to hypothermia did not significantly alter the effect of TTM of 33 °C compared to normothermia and early treatment of fever.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667681PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04231-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac arrest
12
target temperature
12
average time
12
time target
8
33 °c compared
8
compared normothermia
8
based average
8
hypothermia
8
time hypothermia
8
hypothermia fastest
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!