Background: There is promising data on minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy indicating decreased wound complications compared with the standard open approach. We examined our institutional experience with starting a minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy program.
Methods: This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients undergoing videoscopic minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy from August 2017 to March 2022 by a single surgeon. Patients meeting criteria for inguinal lymphadenectomy were considered for minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy unless there was skin involvement by tumor or bulky disease. Data collected included patient characteristics, primary cancer, surgery, and postoperative complications.
Results: There were 26 patients included. The mean age was 60.6 ± 16.2 years. Most patients were female (n = 17, 65.4%), and the primary diagnosis was melanoma (n = 21, 19.2%). In 6 cases (23.1%), minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy was combined with deep pelvic node dissection, but most patients did not have a concurrent procedure (n = 15, 57.7%). The median operative time was 119.0 minutes (range, 89.0-160.0), or 130.5 minutes (range, 89.0-345.0) when including concurrent procedures. The mean number of nodes retrieved was 9.8 ± 3.7, with a positive node identified in 19 patients (73.1%) during minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy. There were 12 (46.2%) patients experiencing at least one postoperative complication within 30 days of surgery, the most common being infection (n = 4, 15.4%). One patient required reoperation for infected hematoma washout. Postoperative intervention for seroma was undertaken in 3 patients (11.5%).
Conclusion: Minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy is a safe approach to inguinal lymph node dissection, in terms of node retrieval and postoperative complications, and can feasibly be adopted into practice with minimal learning curve.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2022.07.052 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Comparing open and video endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.
BJU Int
January 2025
CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Objective: To conduct the first meta-analysis using only prospective studies to evaluate whether video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) offers advantages in perioperative outcomes compared to open IL (OIL) in patients with penile cancer.
Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Latin America and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Scopus, Web of Science, and several trial registries up to June 2024. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies were included.
Comparison of antegrade and retrograde laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
J Cancer Res Ther
December 2024
Department of Radiotherapy, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Purpose: To investigate and compare the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of antegrade and retrograde laparoscopic bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 32 patients with penile cancer admitted between 2018 and 2022. Among them, 17 patients underwent antegrade laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (ALIL group) and 15 underwent retrograde laparoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RLIL group).
Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma: Contemporary Trends in Postoperative Outcomes and Patient Selection With Reduced Case Volumes in the Post-MSLT2 Era.
J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background And Objectives: Since the publication of the German Cooperative Oncology Group Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial and Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT2) trials, the treatment paradigm for node-positive melanoma has shifted from completion lymph node dissection (LND) to nodal ultrasound surveillance. We sought to identify the impact of this practice change on postoperative outcomes in a national cohort.
Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients diagnosed with truncal/extremity malignant melanoma who underwent axillary/inguinal LND.
Introduction Half of all patients with testicular germ cell tumours (GCTs) present with metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes or visceral organs. Inguinal metastases (I/M) are very rare. We aimed to evaluate the relative frequency and clinical features of I/M and to look for predisposing factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) can develop because of inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of gynecologic, genitourinary, and dermatological malignancies. To optimize patient counseling and patient selection for microsurgical interventions aimed at preventing or treating LEL, its prevalence and associated patient characteristics must be accurately documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of literature on the reported prevalence of LEL in patients undergoing inguinal lymphadenectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!