AI Article Synopsis

  • Oxygen is widely used by anesthesiologists, yet its administration practices in surgery and critical care lack clarity and often do not align with WHO recommendations.
  • A survey of 798 ESAIC members revealed that a significant portion are unaware of these guidelines, with only 24% adhering to them; preferences for oxygen levels vary during different phases of anesthesia.
  • The findings suggest a gap between recommended practices and actual use, as many respondents prioritize peripheral oxygen saturation for postoperative therapy and frequently resort to oxygen in critically ill patients, particularly the elderly and those with respiratory issues.

Article Abstract

Background: Oxygen is one of the most commonly used drugs by anesthesiologists. The World Health Organization (WHO) gave recommendations regarding perioperative oxygen administration, but the practice of oxygen use in anesthesia, critical emergency, and intensive care medicine remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted an online survey among members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). The questionnaire consisted of 46 queries appraising the perioperative period, emergency medicine and in the intensive care, knowledge about current recommendations by the WHO, oxygen toxicity, and devices for supplemental oxygen therapy.

Results: Seven hundred ninety-eight ESAIC members (2.1% of all ESAIC members) completed the survey. Most respondents were board-certified and worked in hospitals with > 500 beds. The majority affirmed that they do not use specific protocols for oxygen administration. WHO recommendations are unknown to 42% of respondents, known but not followed by 14%, and known and followed by 24% of them. Respondents prefer inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO) ≥80% during induction and emergence from anesthesia, but intraoperatively < 60% for maintenance, and higher FiO in patients with diseased than non-diseased lungs. Postoperative oxygen therapy is prescribed more commonly according to peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO), but shortage of devices still limits monitoring. When monitoring is used, SpO ≤ 95% is often targeted. In critical emergency medicine, oxygen is used frequently in patients aged ≥80 years, or presenting with respiratory distress, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke. In the intensive care unit, oxygen is mostly targeted at 96%, especially in patients with pulmonary diseases.

Conclusions: The current practice of perioperative oxygen therapy among respondents does not follow WHO recommendations or current evidence, and access to postoperative monitoring devices impairs the individualization of oxygen therapy. Further research and additional teaching about use of oxygen are necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660141PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01884-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intensive care
16
practice oxygen
8
european society
8
society anaesthesiology
8
anaesthesiology intensive
8
oxygen administration
8
esaic members
8
oxygen
7
oxygen anesthesiology
4
anesthesiology survey
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!