Objective: It remains controversial which targeted monoclonal antibodies combined with chemotherapy can provide better efficacy in wild-type KRAS/RAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Therefore, we used this meta-analysis to assess the latest evidence of clinical outcomes.

Materials And Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases for eligible studies published from database inception to May 2022. RevMan 5.4 was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results: 11 RCTs involving a total of 3575 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that EGFR inhibitors significantly prolonged the overall survival (OS) [HR = 0.83, 95%CI (0.73, 0.94), = 0.003] and overall response rate (ORR) [RR = 1.11, 95%CI (1.05, 1.18), = 0.0003] compared to VEGF inhibitors in wild-type KRAS/RAS mCRC patients, but no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) [HR = 0.96, 95%CI (0.87, 1.07), = 0.50]. In subgroup analysis, the survival benefit of EGFR inhibitors was limited to first-line treatment.

Conclusion: Our study showed that EGFR inhibitors were superior to VEGF inhibitors in wild-type KRAS/RAS mCRC patients, especially in patients with first-line treatment. However, subsequent large sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to further verify our conclusions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2022.2147512DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wild-type kras/ras
16
mcrc patients
12
egfr inhibitors
12
kras/ras metastatic
8
metastatic colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
vegf inhibitors
8
inhibitors wild-type
8
kras/ras mcrc
8
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!