Purpose: To investigate the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of echocardiographic super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 97 patients, who underwent CRT and were followed up (median time = 20.33 months). All had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, New-York-Heart-Association class 3 or 4, and Q wave, R wave and S wave (QRS) duration >120 ms. Time-to-peak systolic velocity was measured for individual LV segments by tissue Doppler imaging prior to CRT. Two-dimensional echocardiography was carried out before and at follow-up, and ≥12.5% increase in LVEF was defined as super-response.

Results: From the 97 patients, 23 (23.7%) were super-responders. Super-responders were more frequently female (52.2% vs. 24.3%, respectively; p value = 0.012). Among super-responders, the mean of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly lower. According to dyssynchrony indices, time delay between anteroseptal and posterior wall and SD of all LV segments timing showed significantly higher values in super-responders. By multivariate analysis, LV end-systolic volume and anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay remained independently associated with echocardiographic super-response to CRT.

Conclusion: About one-fourth of our patients with CRT were super-responder in that they had ≥12.5% increase in LVEF by echocardiography. Among all the clinical and echocardiographic measures, only lower LV end-systolic volume and higher anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay predicted super-response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23380DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

echocardiographic super-response
12
super-response cardiac
8
cardiac resynchronization
8
resynchronization therapy
8
clinical echocardiographic
8
wave wave
8
≥125% increase
8
increase lvef
8
end-systolic volume
8
anteroseptal-to-posterior wall
8

Similar Publications

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become an alternative method for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Various modes of LBBAP have been determined, including left bundle trunk pacing (LBTP), left anterior branch pacing (LAFP) and left posterior branch pacing (LPFP). However, whether the outcomes of various pacing modes differ in heart failure (HF) patients is still unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sex differences outcomes in conduction system pacing for patients with typical left bundle branch block.

Int J Cardiol

November 2024

Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China; Key Lab of Cardiovascular Disease of Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China. Electronic address:

Background: Biventricular pacing (BVP) appears to confer more pronounced advantages in women, yet the impact of conduction system pacing (CSP) remains insufficiently characterized. This investigation seeks to elucidate sex-specific disparities in clinical outcomes among patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) undergoing CSP, with a particular focus on assessing contributory factors.

Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, exhibiting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, and manifesting typical LBBB as Strauss criteria, underwent CSP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implication of geriatric nutritional risk index on treatment response and long-term prognosis in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Int J Cardiol

July 2024

Department of Cardiology, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Purpose: Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a simple tool for assessing the nutritional status of the aging population. This study aims to explore the clinical implication of GNRI on treatment response and long-term clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods: Patients who underwent CRT implantation or upgrade at our hospital were retrospectively included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can physiologically correct complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB), and has become the best alternative to biventricular pacing (BiVP).

Objective: To compare the efficacy of LBBP and BiVP in patients with heart failure (HF) complicated with CLBBB.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block Patients With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Can J Cardiol

November 2023

Department of Cardiology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Intervention and Regenerative Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Electronic address:

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) may induce or aggravate heart failure (HF). Few data are available on patients with HF and LBBB with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 40%-50%) and those with preserved EF (HFpEF. LVEF ≥ 50%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!