Alumina-Supported NiMo Hydrotreating Catalysts-Aspects of 3D Structure, Synthesis, and Activity.

J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces

Laboratory of Inorganic Materials and Catalysis, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, Het Kranenveld 14, 5600 MBEindhoven, The Netherlands.

Published: November 2022

Preparation conditions have a vital effect on the structure of alumina-supported hydrodesulfurization (HDS) catalysts. To explore this effect, we prepared two NiMoS/AlO catalyst samples with the same target composition using different chemical sources and characterizing the oxidic NiMo precursors and sulfided and spent catalysts to understand the influence of catalyst structure on performance. The sample prepared from ammonium heptamolybdate and nickel nitrate (sample A) contains Mo in the oxidic precursor predominantly in tetrahedral coordination in the form of crystalline domains, which show low reducibility and strong metal-support interactions. This property influences the sulfidation process such that the sulfidation processes of Ni and Mo occur tendentially separately with a decreased efficiency to form active Ni-Mo-S particles. Moreover, inactive unsupported MoS particles or isolated NiS species are formed, which are either washed off during catalytic reaction or aggregated to larger particles as seen in scanning transmission electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM/EDX). The oxidic precursor of the sample synthesized using nickel carbonate and molybdenum trioxide as metal sources (sample B), however, contains Mo in octahedral coordination and shows higher reducibility of the metal species as well as weaker metal-support interactions than that of sample A; these properties allow an efficient sulfidation of Mo and Ni such that formation of active Ni-Mo-S particles is the main product. Ptychographic X-ray computed tomography (PXCT) and STEM and EDX measurements show that the structure formed during sulfidation is stable under operation conditions. The structural differences explain the HDS activity difference between these two samples and explain why sample B is much active than sample A.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639170PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oxidic precursor
8
metal-support interactions
8
active ni-mo-s
8
ni-mo-s particles
8
sample
7
alumina-supported nimo
4
nimo hydrotreating
4
hydrotreating catalysts-aspects
4
structure
4
catalysts-aspects structure
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!