Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This work experimentally determines the in-plane lateral load behavior of a full-scale WPVC composite log-wall, with and without additional through-bolts. The results indicate that the WPVC composite log-wall panel with through-bolts produced higher hysteretic parameter values in terms of strength and energy dissipation than the log-wall without through bolts due to a reduction in wall uplift (48.2% for secant stiffness of cycle, 39.5% for hysteretic energy at the last displacement level). The WPVC composite log-wall panel with through-bolts presented better structural stability and was recommended for investigation. A finite element model (FEM) of a WPVC composite log-wall panel with through-bolts was created using beam elements as log-members and multilinear plastic links as connections, and was verified by the experimental results. The verified FEM was used for further parametric study of wall dimensions and first log-foundation locations. The parametric investigations indicated that increasing panel height and width unfavorably affected lateral load capacity, monotonic and cyclic stiffness, and energy dissipation. The cyclic stiffness decreased by 39% while energy dissipation increased by 78.8%, for the last displacement level when the wall height was increased from 2.350 m to 3.525 m. The cyclic stiffness and energy dissipation of a panel with a width of 6 m decreased 14% and 24.4% compared to a panel with a width of 3.5 m. Moreover, moving log-foundation connections from the original position to the edges of the panel improved performance under monotonic and cyclic horizontal loads; an increase in the number of log-foundation connections had an insignificant effect on panel behavior.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9656195 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14214673 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!