Objective: To determine the relationships, if any, between use of seclusion and restraint and factors such as demographic parameters, diagnosis, legal admission status (voluntary or involuntary), symptoms, cognitive function, global functioning, therapeutic alliance, attitudes toward medication, and insight, among psychiatry inpatients in Ireland.
Methods: We used validated tools to perform detailed assessments of 107 adult psychiatry inpatients admitted to acute psychiatry units at 2 general hospitals in Dublin, Ireland over a 30-month period, between September 2017 and February 2020.
Results: The most common diagnoses in our sample were affective disorders (46.7%), schizophrenia and related disorders (27.1%), and personality and behavioral disorders (11.2%). Over a quarter (n=29, 27.1%) of the participating patients had involuntary legal status. Of the 107 patients, 11 patients (10.3%) experienced sedation and/or physical restraint, with 9 patients (8.4%) experiencing at least 1 episode of seclusion and 10 patients (9.3%) experiencing at least 1 episode of physical restraint. On the basis of multivariable analyses, seclusion was associated with younger age and involuntary status, while physical restraint was associated with involuntary status. Each multivariable model explained just over one third of the variance in the distribution of these seclusion and restraint practices.
Conclusions: Use of seclusion and restraint was most strongly associated with involuntary admission status and, in the case of seclusion, younger age, rather than sex, diagnosis, symptoms, cognitive function, global functioning, therapeutic alliance, attitudes toward medication, or insight. The network of interactions between involuntary status and use of seclusion and restraint merits much closer attention, especially as use of seclusion and physical restraint appears to be associated with involuntary legal status independent of level of symptoms, therapeutic alliance, or insight.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000665 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Perceptions Among Mental Health Professionals Regarding the Intrusiveness of Coercive Measures: A Danish Regional Survey.
J Forensic Nurs
December 2024
Author Affiliations:Forensic Mental Health Research Unit, Middelfart, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Background: Although hotly disputed, coercive measures are widely used in mental health services globally. In Denmark, to ensure the rights of patients, special psychiatric legislation that emphasizes the imperative to always use the least intrusive intervention has been implemented. This raises the question of which coercive measures are perceived as being less intrusive than others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiminishing restrictive practices in psychiatric wards virtual reality training: Old wine in a new bottle?
World J Psychiatry
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
This editorial examines the application of virtual reality (VR) training to mitigate restrictive practices (RPs) within psychiatric facilities. RPs include physical restraints, seclusion, and chemical restraints, used to ensure patient safety but with varying usage rates across regions. In recent years, there has been a growing focus on the adverse effects of RPs on both healthcare workers and patients, leading to calls for its reduction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOvercoming the lack of alternatives - Changes in the use of coercive measures after implementation of the recovery-oriented "Weddinger Modell" in acute psychiatric care.
J Psychiatr Res
November 2024
Charité - Berlin University Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, D - 10117, Berlin, Germany; Clinics in the Theodor-Wenzel-Werk, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Potsdamer Chaussee 69, D - 14129, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address:
Introduction: Due to the ethical conflict potential and far-reaching negative consequences of coercive measures (CM) in acute psychiatry, approaches to reduce the use of CM are investigated increasingly. One approach is the recovery-, resilience-, and patient-centered "Weddinger Modell" (WM) for inpatient psychiatric care. The present study evaluates the WM and investigates whether cases affected by CM, cases affected by seclusion or restraint, and the number, total duration, and average individual duration of CM per case are significantly reduced after WM-implementation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMethodological Issues in Measuring Restrictive Care Practices (Mechanical/physical restraint, Chemical restraint and Seclusion) in Adult Mental Health Inpatient Units: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature.
J Clin Nurs
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aims: To identify and characterise the approaches and instruments used in recent literature to measure the prevalence of restrictive care practices in adult mental health inpatient units. Additionally, it sought to summarise the reported psychometric properties, including reliability and validity of these measures.
Methods: A systematic review of recent litratures was conducted using Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Embase databases to identify studies published from 1 January 2010 to 11 October 2023.
Patient-Centered Communication: Incorporating Principles of Dialogic Practice and Family Centered Rounds on an Inpatient Psychotic Disorders Unit.
Community Ment Health J
December 2024
McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, USA.
This study examined the impact of Patient-Centered Communication (PCC), Open Dialogue-inspired changes to rounding practices and culture, on patient perceptions of care on an inpatient psychotic disorders unit. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted based on medical records, restraint and seclusion records, and hospital Perceptions of Care (PoC) surveys. The analysis compared data from 6-month periods before and after implementation of PCC to quantify whether the implementation of PCC was associated with more positive care ratings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!