A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Investigation of optimal energy or density of a fractional CO laser system in the treatment of stable non-segmental vitiligo. | LitMetric

Background: Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser has been considered to be an add-on to conventional treatments of vitiligo.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the optimal energy and density of the fractional CO2 laser system in stable non-segmental vitiligo (NSV) patients.

Method: 48 patients were treated with fractional CO2 laser and sequential phototherapies of narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), after the CO2 laser treatment, a compound betamethasone solution was topically applied. For the fractional CO2 laser, coverages of 8% and 12.6% were set as low density (Ld) and high density (Hd), and energies of 60 mJ and 80 mJ were set as low energy (Le) and high energy (He), respectively. The patients were randomly assigned to Group A (HeHd), Group B (HeLd) or Group C (LeLd).

Results: Either after 3 or 6 months of enrollment, the efficacy of Group C was better than Group B (p < 0.05). No difference was seen between Group A and Group B or Group A and Group C (p > 0.05). More patients complained higher pain score in Group A as compared with Group C (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The optimal parameters of the fractional CO2 laser were energy at 60 mJ and density at 8%.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101684DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

co2 laser
20
fractional co2
12
optimal energy
8
energy density
8
density fractional
8
laser system
8
stable non-segmental
8
non-segmental vitiligo
8
set low
8
group
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!