Duration of Device-Based Fever Prevention after Cardiac Arrest.

N Engl J Med

From the Departments of Cardiology (C.H., J.G., R.P.B., S.B., M.S.F., D.E.H., Y.A.I., J.J., M.G.L., B.C.N., L.E.R.O., F.T.S., J.H.T., S.C.W., M.W.-J., M.A.S.M., J.K.) and Neurology (D.K.), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, the Departments of Clinical Medicine (C.H., D.K., J.K.) and Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology (V.R.L.J.), University of Copenhagen, and the Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg (J.J.T.), Copenhagen, and the Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (C.H., H.S., J.E.M., B.B., J.S.D.), and the Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (H.S., S.M., E.M., S.V.) and Cardiology (J.E.M., B.B., D.B.-J., J.S.D., L.S.), Odense University Hospital, Odense - all in Denmark.

Published: March 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Guidelines recommend active fever prevention for 72 hours after cardiac arrest, but evidence from clinical trials on its effectiveness is lacking.
  • In a study of comatose patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest, researchers compared temperature control interventions for either 36 or 72 hours.
  • The results showed no significant differences in mortality or disability rates between the two groups at 90 days, indicating that fever prevention for 36 hours could be as effective as 72 hours.

Article Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend active fever prevention for 72 hours after cardiac arrest. Data from randomized clinical trials of this intervention have been lacking.

Methods: We randomly assigned comatose patients who had been resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause to device-based temperature control targeting 36°C for 24 hours followed by targeting of 37°C for either 12 or 48 hours (for total intervention times of 36 and 72 hours, respectively) or until the patient regained consciousness. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or hospital discharge with a Cerebral Performance Category of 3 or 4 (range, 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating more severe disability; a category of 3 or 4 indicates severe cerebral disability or coma) within 90 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included death from any cause and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score (range, 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive ability) at 3 months.

Results: A total of 393 patients were randomly assigned to temperature control for 36 hours, and 396 patients were assigned to temperature control for 72 hours. At 90 days after randomization, a primary end-point event had occurred in 127 of 393 patients (32.3%) in the 36-hour group and in 133 of 396 patients (33.6%) in the 72-hour group (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.26; P = 0.70) and mortality was 29.5% in the 36-hour group and 30.3% in the 72-hour group. At 3 months, the median Montreal Cognitive Assessment score was 26 (interquartile range, 24 to 29) and 27 (interquartile range, 24 to 28), respectively. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of adverse events.

Conclusions: Active device-based fever prevention for 36 or 72 hours after cardiac arrest did not result in significantly different percentages of patients dying or having severe disability or coma. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation; BOX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141099.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2212528DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiac arrest
16
fever prevention
12
temperature control
12
device-based fever
8
prevention hours
8
hours cardiac
8
randomly assigned
8
range higher
8
higher scores
8
scores indicating
8

Similar Publications

Cardiogenic shock represents a critical condition in which the heart is unable to maintain adequate circulation leading to insufficient tissue perfusion and end-organ failure. Temporary mechanical circulatory support offers the potential to stabilize patients, provide a bridge-to-recovery, provide a bridge-to-decision, or facilitate definitive heart replacement therapies. Although randomized controlled trials have been performed in infarct-related cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest, the optimal timing, appropriate patient selection, and optimal implementation of these devices remain complex and predominantly based on observational data and expert consensus, especially in non-ischaemic shock.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Despite its low prevalence, premature myocardial infarction (MI) bears serious social consequences and shares different pathophysiology.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate young MI patients in terms of clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.

Patients And Methods: This study is an observational research covering 221 patients <45 years old [16.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective Prior studies have described the patterns of emergency medical service (EMS) activations in national parks in the United States. However, little data exists regarding EMS activations in local and regional outdoor recreational locations. We performed a retrospective analysis of EMS activations originating from parks and recreational areas in suburban Howard County, Maryland, to characterize those activations determined to be time-critical emergencies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: An anomalous left vertebral artery (aLVA) can complicate aortic arch surgery. We examined the safety of various aLVA revascularization strategies during open total arch replacement.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients undergoing total arch replacement from January 2018 to May 2023 and identified 11 patients with aLVA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This scoping review aimed to identify potential variables influencing healthcare provider's perceived workload or stress when performing resuscitation on patients in cardiac arrest.

Methods: We searched Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) to identify studies published prior to February 1, 2024. We used a PECO format for this review: the population were healthcare providers performing resuscitation during simulated or real cardiac arrest; the exposure was the presence of any factor that could impact perceived workload or stress; and the comparator was the absence of any specific factor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!