Purpose: Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures are challenging injuries. Multiple factors must be carefully evaluated for an adequate therapeutic strategy, such as the state of bone healing, the type of implant, the time and performed personnel of previous surgery, and the stability of fixation. The aim of this study is to propose a rationale for the treatment.
Methods: The peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) system, a therapeutic algorithm was developed for the management of all patients presenting a subtype A PIFF, based on the type of the original implant (extra- vs. intra-medullary), implant length and fracture location. The adequacy and reliability of the proposed algorithm and the fracture healing process were assessed at the last clinical follow-up using the Parker mobility score and radiological assessment, respectively. In addition, all complications were noticed. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, or median and range according to their distribution. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages.
Results: This is a retrospective case series of 33 PIFFs, and the mean post-operative Parker mobility score was (5.60 ± 2.54) points. Five patients (15.1%) achieved complete mobility without aids (9 points) and 1 (3.0%) patient was not able to walk. Two other patients (6.1%) were non-ambulatory prior to PPIF. The mean follow-up was (21.51 ± 9.12) months (range 6 - 48 months). There were 7 (21.2%) complications equally distributed between patients managed either with nailing or plating. There were no cases of nonunion or mechanical failure of the original implant.
Conclusion: The proposed treatment algorithm shows adequate, reliable and straightforward to assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon on the difficult decision-making process regarding the management of PIFF occurring in previously healed fractures. In addition, it may become a useful tool to optimize the use of the classification, thus potentially improving the outcomes and minimizing complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388253 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001 | DOI Listing |
J Bone Joint Surg Am
December 2024
Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Background: Subtrochanteric proximal femoral fractures are generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation. We aimed to compare outcomes of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) or dual lag screw (INTERTAN nail, IN) device.
Methods: The primary outcome measure was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out or back-out, nail breakage, or peri-implant fracture.
Chin J Traumatol
December 2024
Traumatology Unit, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, 20157, Italy.
Purpose: Femur fractures are among the most common fractures treated surgically, representing a significant challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Peri-implant femoral fractures (PIFFs) represent a rare complication of the surgical treatment. It is necessary to pay attention during osteosynthesis, evaluating not only the fracture site but the entire femoral skeletal structure, the characteristics of the fracture, the health comorbidities, and the risk of malunion and pseudarthrosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Musculoskelet Disord
November 2024
Division of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Musculoskeletal Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Tao-Yuan, 33302, Taiwan.
Background: Perioperative peri-implant fractures (PPIFs) pose infrequent yet significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, particularly in the context of femoral pertrochanteric fractures (FPF) treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation 2 (PFNA-2) nails. PPIFs can lead to prolonged recovery and may necessitate re-osteosynthesis in severe cases. Despite the effectiveness of PFNA-2 in the management of FPFs, our understanding of PPIFs in this specific context remains limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop
May 2025
HCA Medical City Healthcare UNT-TCU GME (Denton) Program, Texas Bone and Joint, United States.
Background: We sought to investigate the relationship between peritrochanteric femur fracture (OTA 31A fractures) fixation and rates of peri-implant fracture, rates of transfusion, and the rates of increased dependence after secondary surgery for fracture for short cephalomedullary nails (SCMN), long cephalomedullary nails (LCMN), and plate and screw devices (PSD).
Methods: Multi center retrospective study involving data collected from 151 Level I-IV trauma centers using ICD9/10 and CPT codes for identification. 13,197 patients with peritrochanteric femur fractures between 2016 and 2021 were included in analysis.
Eur J Dent
November 2024
Liaison Center for Innovative Dentistry, Graduate Scholl of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Japan.
Objective: The failure of dental implant treatments is predominantly attributed to peri-implantitis, which entails chronic inflammation within the peri-implant tissue, ultimately leading to tissue degradation. Addressing this condition, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (hUCMSC) transplantation serves as a regenerative therapy; however, concerns regarding the viability and efficacy of transplanted cells in inflamed regions persist. Hypoxic preconditioning of hUCMSCs has emerged as a potential strategy for augmenting their regenerative and immunomodulatory capacities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!