Taking benefits of using PCMs in buildings to meet energy efficiency criteria in net zero by 2050.

Chemosphere

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran. Electronic address:

Published: January 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • PCMs can significantly reduce energy consumption and CO emissions in buildings by improving thermal storage capabilities.
  • A study compared buildings with no PCMs, those with PCMs not undergoing phase change, and those with active phase change, revealing that PCM enhancements led to a notable reduction in power usage and a shift in the importance of sensible versus latent storage.
  • Optimizing the placement of PCMs and understanding their phase transition behavior can maximize energy savings and emissions reductions, with results indicating that even without phase change, PCMs can still be effective in decreasing energy use and CO emissions.

Article Abstract

Considering the share of 40% and 35% of buildings in energy consumption as well as CO emissions, adding phase change materials (PCMs) is an effective technique to tackle high energy demand and considerable CO emissions. When PCMs are injected into the building envelopes, they improved the sensible/latent storage features of the envelopes. In this study, using numerical methods, defining first (no PCM), second (PCM without phase transition), and third building (with phase transition), the importance of sensible storage feature was compared to latent one. It was found that the sensible/latent importance is dependent on the thermal resistance of the envelopes and setpoint. At setpoint 22 °C, it was found that the PCM-enhanced building consumed less power by 32.4 kWhm. Under this condition, the share of sensible storage as well as latent storage was 54% and 46%, respectively. The reason for the lower share of latent storage was that PCM never participated in phase change about 40% of the year. To boost PCM effectiveness, it was found that the PCM installation near the uppermost layer enhanced energy-saving by 3.72 kWhm. The presence of phase change in PCM is not always considered a positive point. In one situation, it was observed that if PCM did not undergo phase transition, it reduces energy consumption by 9.4 kWhm, while for PCM with phase transition this value was 7.1 kWhm. PCM was also beneficial on CO reduction either with phase change or without phase change. In the former, CO emissions declined by 34.9 kgm, and under the latter circumstances it was 23.9 kgm.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phase change
20
phase transition
16
phase
9
pcm
9
energy consumption
8
pcm phase
8
sensible storage
8
latent storage
8
kwhm pcm
8
change
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!