Introduction And Hypothesis: Telemedicine has been recommended for the management of urogynecological conditions during the coronavirus (COVID 19) pandemic. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of telemedicine for urogynecology at a Brazilian public hospital.
Methods: A descriptive observational study was performed at a urogynecology outpatient clinic. The primary outcome was the desire to continue with telemedicine. Secondary outcomes were appointment resolvability, technical aspects of the appointment, and patient satisfaction. The participants had in-person appointments that were canceled because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected data on sociodemographic characteristics and clinical and technical aspects of the appointments. The participants responded to satisfaction questionnaires 7-15 days post-procedure. The categorical variables were evaluated based on absolute and relative frequency. The continuous variables were described as the mean and standard deviation. A chi-square test was performed to determine the association between variables.
Results: In total, 225 patients had appointments canceled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, of which 171 were eligible for the study. Telemedicine appointments were agreed upon by 48% of the participants and 85.5% responded to the satisfaction survey. We found that 57.7% of the participants desired to continue with telemedicine. The appointment resolvability rate was 76.1%, 63.4% of the appointments met the technical criteria, and the satisfaction rate was 93%. The only variable associated with the desire to continue telemedicine was overall patient satisfaction (p=0.02).
Conclusions: Telemedicine in urogynecology is feasible and can be implemented in the studied population. However, actions are essential to adequately support patient preference and improve the acceptance of telemedicine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9638453 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05392-2 | DOI Listing |
Obstet Gynecol
January 2025
Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, and the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, and the Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California.
Obstet Gynecol
October 2024
Center for Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, and the Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Objective: To compare patient satisfaction, health care resource utilization, and adverse events among patients receiving a virtual video compared with in-office postoperative visit after urogynecologic surgery. We hypothesized that virtual video visits would be noninferior to in-office visits.
Methods: This was a randomized noninferiority clinical trial of patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence at a single academic tertiary referral center.
J Robot Surg
June 2024
Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, University of Chicago, Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Heliyon
May 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Healthcare, Camden, NJ, USA.
Objective: Urogynecology patients skew older and often require intimate exams to treat non-life-threatening conditions, thus making care particularly susceptible to the effects of COVID-19. We aim to understand COVID-19 vaccination attitudes amongst urogynecology patients during the pandemic, which has adversely affected healthcare delivery, to identify measures that can be undertaken to improve care going forward.
Study Design: Cross-sectional surveys of urogynecology patients were conducted in three different states (Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania) between March and August 2021.
Int Urogynecol J
March 2024
Department of Women's Health, The University of Texas Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Introduction And Hypothesis: There is a need for cost effective interventions that increase surgical preparedness in urogynecology.
Methods: We performed an ancillary prospective economic evaluation of the Telehealth Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness for Surgery (TIPPS) Trial, a randomized multicenter trial that evaluated the impact of a preoperative telehealth call on surgical preparedness in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. A within-trial analysis from the health care sector and societal perspective was performed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!