Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer (PC) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is gaining in popularity as it is noninvasive and associated with fewer side effects than standard whole-gland treatments. However, better methods to evaluate response to HIFU ablation are an unmet need. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptors are both overexpressed in PC. In this study, we evaluated a novel approach of using both Ga-RM2 and Ga-PSMA11 PET/MRI in each patient before and after HIFU to assess the accuracy of target tumor localization and response to treatment. Fourteen men, 64.5 ± 8.0 y old (range, 48-78 y), with newly diagnosed PC were prospectively enrolled. Before HIFU, the patients underwent prostate biopsy, multiparametric MRI, Ga-PSMA11, and Ga-RM2 PET/MRI. Response to treatment was assessed at a minimum of 6 mo after HIFU with prostate biopsy ( = 13), as well as Ga-PSMA11 and Ga-RM2 PET/MRI ( = 14). The SUV and SUV of known or suspected PC lesions were collected. Pre-HIFU biopsy revealed 18 cancers, of which 14 were clinically significant (Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4). Multiparametric MRI identified 18 lesions; 14 of them were at least score 4 in the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System. Ga-PSMA11 and Ga-RM2 PET/MRI each showed 23 positive intraprostatic lesions; 21 were congruent in 13 patients, and 5 were incongruent in 5 patients. Before HIFU, Ga-PSMA11 identified all target tumors, whereas Ga-RM2 PET/MRI missed 2 tumors. After HIFU, Ga-RM2 and Ga-PSMA11 PET/MRI both identified clinically significant residual disease in 1 patient. Three significant ipsilateral recurrent lesions were identified, whereas 1 was missed by Ga-PSMA11. The pretreatment level of prostate-specific antigen decreased significantly after HIFU, by 66%. Concordantly, the pretreatment SUV decreased significantly after HIFU for Ga-PSMA11 ( = 0.001) and Ga-RM2 ( = 0.005). This pilot study showed that Ga-PSMA11 and Ga-RM2 PET/MRI identified the target tumor for HIFU in 100% and 86% of cases, respectively, and accurately verified response to treatment. PET may be a useful tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment success in patients receiving focal therapy for PC. These preliminary findings warrant larger studies for validation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264783 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!