To obtain a single percept of the world, the visual system must combine inputs from the two eyes. Understanding the principles that govern this binocular combination process has important real-world clinical and technological applications. However, most research examining binocular combination has relied on relatively simple visual stimuli and it is unclear how well the findings apply to real-world scenarios. For example, it is well-known that, when the two eyes view sine wave gratings with differing contrast (dichoptic stimuli), the binocular percept often matches the higher contrast grating. Does this winner-take-all property of binocular contrast combination apply to more naturalistic imagery, which include broadband structure and spatially varying contrast? To better understand binocular combination during naturalistic viewing, we conducted psychophysical experiments characterizing binocular contrast perception for a range of visual stimuli. In two experiments, we measured the binocular contrast perception of dichoptic sine wave gratings and naturalistic stimuli, and asked how the contrast of the surrounding context affected percepts. Binocular contrast percepts were close to winner-take-all across many of the stimuli when the surrounding context was the average contrast of the two eyes. However, we found that changing the surrounding context modulated the binocular percept of some patterns and not others. We show evidence that this contextual effect may be due to the spatial orientation structure of the stimuli. These findings provide a step toward understanding binocular combination in the natural world and highlight the importance of considering the effect of the spatial interactions in complex stimuli.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645364 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/jov.22.12.7 | DOI Listing |
Eye Contact Lens
November 2024
Department of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy (K.J.M.-G., D.F., D.P.P.), University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain; and Advanced Clinic Optometry Unit (D.P.P.), Department of Ophthalmology, Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
Purpose: To investigate the impact on distance and near contrast sensitivity (CS) after fitting multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) for presbyopia correction according to the scientific evidence already published.
Methods: Three bibliographic search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria were articles written in English evaluating distance and/or near CS in presbyopic patients using MFCLs, controlled clinical trials, and articles published from 2000 to 2024.
Brain Sci
November 2024
School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
Binocular vision may serve as a good model for research on awareness. Binocular summation (BS) can be defined as the superiority of binocular over monocular visual performance. Early studies of BS found an improvement of a factor of about 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, McGill Vision Research, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
In amblyopia, abnormal binocular interactions lead to an overwhelming dominance of one eye. One mechanism implied in this imbalance is the suppression between the inputs from the two eyes. This interocular suppression involves two components: an overlay suppression and a surround suppression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Donostia University Hospital, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
Purpose: To describe the visual, refractive, functional, and patient satisfaction outcomes of the Bi-Flex POB-MA 877PEY (Elon, Medicontur Medical Engineering Ltd. Zsámbék, Hungary) extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDoF IOL).
Patients And Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal descriptive study.
Int J Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1616913111, Iran.
Aim: To investigate the effect of astigmatism and spherical equivalent (SE) correction on contrast sensitivity (CS).
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 103 visually normal subjects aged 18 to 36y with bilateral regular astigmatism in range of 1.00 diopter cylinder (DC) to 4.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!