Clinician perceptions of Passport for Care, a web-based clinical decision support tool for survivorship care plan delivery.

Background: The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines provide exposure-based risks and recommendations for late effects screening of survivors of childhood cancer. Passport for Care (PFC) is a web-based clinical decision support tool for generating a personalized survivorship care plan (SCP) derived from the Guidelines and user-entered exposures. We assessed PFC clinician user practices and perceptions of PFC impact on clinic workflow, guidelines application, and survivor shared decision-making.

Procedure: A 35-item REDCap survey was emailed to all PFC users (n = 936) in 146 current and former PFC user clinics. Anonymous responses were permitted. Results were summarized and compared with a 2012 survey.

Results: Data were available from 148 respondents representing 64 out of 146 PFC user clinics (minimum clinic response rate 44%, excluding 49 anonymous responses). Generation of a personalized SCP was the most common application of PFC, followed by determination of surveillance recommendations and use as a survivor database. Twenty-five respondents (17%) felt data entry was a significant or insurmountable barrier to PFC application. Sixty-nine percent of respondents attributed PFC with a very high/high impact on guidelines adherence in their clinical practice, compared with 40% who attributed PFC with having a significant impact on adherence in 2012 (p < .001).

Conclusion: The survey results provide valuable insights on patterns of SCP delivery and Survivor Clinic workflow. User-perceived benefits to PFC included facilitating clinician ability to follow guidelines recommendations in clinical practice. Importantly, some barriers to resource utilization were also identified, suggesting a need for user-informed adaptations to further improve uptake.