A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Epidemiology, management, and outcome of infection, sepsis, and septic shock in a German emergency department (EpiSEP study). | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the epidemiology and treatment of infections in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), finding that nearly 19.3% of 6,607 patients treated had an infection.
  • Key sites of infection included the respiratory tract (35%) and genitourinary tract (18%), with most cases classified as infection only (86%), while sepsis (10%) and septic shock (3%) were less common.
  • Significant differences were observed in vital signs and emergency sepsis scores between the groups of patients with infection, sepsis, and septic shock, indicating varying levels of severity among them.

Article Abstract

Background: The adjacent conditions infection, sepsis, and septic shock are among the most common causes of treatment in the emergency department (ED). Most available data come from intensive care units (ICU) and include nosocomial infections acquired during hospitalization. Epidemiological data from German EDs are not yet available, although the ED is one of the first points of contact for patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology, causes, diagnosis, mortality, and treatment of patients with infections in the ED.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective, single-center observational study, routinely collected data from the patient data management system and from the hospital information system were analyzed. All adult patients who presented to the ED in connection with an infection during the study period from 01/01 to 28/02/2019 were included. Exclusion criteria were age ≤ 17 years and incomplete records. Three groups (I. Infection, II. Sepsis, and III. Septic shock) were defined according to SEPSIS-3 definitions.

Results: During the study period, a total of 6,607 patients were treated in the ED. Of these patients, 19.3% ( = 1,278) had an infection (mean age 56 ± 23 years, 50% female). The sites of infection were distributed as follows: Respiratory tract 35%, genitourinary tract 18%, maxillofacial/ears/nose/throat 14%, intraabdominal 13%, soft tissues 10%, central nervous system 1%, other cause 3%, or unknown cause 6%. Infection only, sepsis and septic shock were present in 86, 10, and 3%, respectively. There were significant differences in vital signs as well as in the various emergency sepsis scores across the predefined groups [I vs. II vs. III: SOFA (pts.): 1 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 2 vs. 7 ± 3 ( < 0.0001), systolic blood pressure (mmHg): 137 ± 25 vs. 128 ± 32 vs. 107 ± 34 ( < 0.05), heart rate (bpm): 92 ± 18 vs. 99 ± 23 vs. 113 ± 30 ( < 0.05), respiratory rate (min-1): 18 ± 4 vs. 20 ± 7 vs. 24 ± 10 ( < 0.05)]. In the three groups, blood cultures were obtained in 34, 81, and 86%, of cases, respectively and antibiotics were administered in the ED in 50, 89, and 86%, of cases respectively. The 30-day mortality rate in the three groups was 1.6, 12.0, and 38.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: This study is the first to show the incidence, management, and outcome of patients classified as infection, sepsis, and septic shock in a German ED. The findings of our real-world data are important for quality management and enable the optimization of treatment pathways for patients with infectious diseases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9618593PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.997992DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infection sepsis
20
septic shock
20
sepsis septic
16
three groups
12
management outcome
8
infection
8
shock german
8
emergency department
8
study period
8
86% cases
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!