Background: Cranioplasty in pediatrics is quite challenging and intricated. The ideal material for it is still debatable until now due to the limited study comparing autologous and implant grafts. This meta-analytic study was conducted to evaluate the risk of infection and revision in pediatric patients after autograft and implant cranioplasty.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and ScienceDirect database. Articles published from 2000 to 2021 were selected systematically using PRISMA based on the predetermined eligibility criteria. The relevant data were, then, analyzed and discussed.

Results: A total of four publications investigating the outcome of autograft and implant cranioplasty were included and reviewed. Postoperative infection and revision rate after 126 cranioplasty procedures (both autograft or implant) from 119 patients below 21 years during time frame of study were analyzed. This meta-analysis study showed that the rate of infection and revision after cranioplasty were not different between the autograft and implant groups.

Conclusion: Autograft and implant cranioplasty have no significant difference in postoperatively infection and revision rate. This study showed that cranioplasty using implant is a plausible option in pediatric patients with cranial defects, depending on the patients' condition due to similar outcome with autograft cranioplasty. Further studies with larger population and more specific details are necessary to determine the comparison of autograft and implant material in cranioplasty procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9610369PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1204_2021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

autograft implant
28
infection revision
16
implant cranioplasty
12
implant
9
cranioplasty
9
comparison autograft
8
cranioplasty pediatrics
8
pediatric patients
8
outcome autograft
8
revision rate
8

Similar Publications

Background: Continued advancements in cartilage surgery and an accumulating body of evidence warrants a contemporary synthesis of return to sport (RTS) outcomes to provide updated prognostic data and to better understand treatment response.

Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review of RTS in athletes after knee cartilage restoration surgery.

Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is well established as a viable chondral restoration procedure for the treatment of symptomatic, focal chondral defects of the knee. The efficacy of secondary OCA in the setting of failed index cartilage repair or restoration is poorly understood.

Purpose: To evaluate radiographic and clinical outcomes, failures, and reoperations after OCA after failed index cartilage repair or restoration of the knee.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Options for pediatric heart valve replacement.

Future Cardiol

January 2025

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Heart valve replacement is indicated for children with irreparable heart valve disease. These replacements come in a variety of forms including mechanical, xenograft tissue, allograft tissue, and autograft tissue valves. These options each have unique benefits and risks profiles.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft is a reliable graft option that has recently increased in use. Varying harvesting and graft preparation techniques available and improved technology and implant design continue to make quadricep tendon preparation more efficient and reproducible. In this Technical Note, we describe our preferred technique for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft preparation after harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between preoperative whole-joint imaging evaluation of the knee with patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures after cartilage restoration surgery (mosaicplasty, osteochondral allograft transplantation, matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent knee articular cartilage restoration at our institution from 2014 to 2020. The patients' knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated with the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) and semiquantitative synovial inflammation imaging biomarkers of the preoperative MRI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!