Introduction: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) provides a path for individuals who are undocumented to join the physician workforce. Indeed, recipients of DACA can play an important role in addressing health inequities in medicine. Although DACA has been in place since 2012, many medical schools remain unaware of it or are hesitant to consider recipients for admission. In a similar vein, the premedical community, including those with DACA status, may be unaware of their eligibility and the steps necessary to pursue medicine. Further education and outreach are needed to achieve institutional policies conducive to the inclusion and success of those undocumented in medicine.
Methods: We created an hour-long workshop to empower learners with key knowledge relevant to DACA policy and its impact on medicine. We evaluated the workshop through pre- and postworkshop questionnaires assessing participant knowledge and attitudes based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB).
Results: A total of 112 participants engaged in our workshop. Ninety-one pretests and 61 posttests were completed by attendees. Data revealed a significant increase in performance on all knowledge-based and TPB questions, including intention to participate in future policy development. Moreover, participants reported appreciating the interactive nature of the session and expressed feelings of empowerment by their newfound knowledge base.
Discussion: This workshop provides a promising foundation from which conversations and progress regarding DACA-related medical education policy can begin. Specifically, the workshop engages participants in the process of identifying actionable steps for overcoming barriers to inclusion and support.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9576827 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11279 | DOI Listing |
J Surg Educ
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; John Cochran VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri.
Objective: Identify changes in general surgery resident autonomy and resident postgraduate year (PGY) level in Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) cases over time.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: United States Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital system, 2004 to 2020.
Clin Psychol Eur
September 2024
Department of Psychology, Reykjavík University, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Background: Impulsivity symptoms have been studied thoroughly in adults with ADHD, including hasty actions and decisions without considering possible consequences. The objective of our study was to investigate impulsive buying and deferment of gratification among adults with ADHD and a comparison group.
Method: The participants were 225 adults with ADHD and 121 university students who completed the Buying Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), the Deferment of Gratification Questionnaire (DOGQ), the Adult ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS), as well as background questions.
Pediatrics
December 2024
Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Med Anthropol Q
October 2024
Department of African, African American and Diaspora Studies, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Following the recommendation of the WHO in the mid-2000s, the Ugandan government banned traditional birth attendants (TBAs) and encouraged all women to give birth in biomedical clinics. Yet in rural Luuka district, about half of women still give birth at home or with the assistance of lay providers. This article examines women's healthcare behavior to better understand decisions that are characterized as irrational by officials, in particular women's choices to delay care, move between providers, and defer health decisions to others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFScience
October 2024
Rashada Alexander is director of the AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowships* program, Washington, DC, USA.
In June, the US Supreme Court overturned a 40-yearold legal principle known as the doctrine, which deferred to federal agencies on how regulations are interpreted in legal cases when the legislation enacted by Congress is unclear. Striking a blow against this precedent, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts indicated that was "fundamentally misguided" and that only the nation's courts have the prerogative to interpret the laws they administer. Judges across the United States now anticipate an onslaught of litigation seeking to overturn federal regulatory actions, and many of these lawsuits will turn on scientific evidence that guided those actions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!