To describe a monitoring and early intervention process for students at risk of substandard performance on advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs). Using a dashboard of key indicators, students with potential deficits in knowledge, skills, or noncognitive attributes were identified as at risk of substandard performance on APPEs and placed on a list of students to be monitored during the APPE year. Employing a traffic light-based approach, at-risk students were initially designated with a monitoring status of red. If no issues were identified, students were de-escalated to yellow status and, subsequently, to green status. Monitored students who had issues or received a substandard evaluation on APPEs had a deficit-specific action plan implemented. For the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 academic years, 87 of 499 students entering APPEs were monitored. Of those 87 students, 77 (88.5%) completed experiences successfully on the first attempt, but 66 (75.9%) did require extended higher-level (red or yellow) monitoring. Over these two years, 54 (62.1%) of the 87 students deemed at risk did not have a substandard performance on APPEs, with 26 in the 2018-2019 year and 28 in the 2019-2020 year. A student monitoring and early intervention process may be beneficial in assisting at-risk students to successfully complete APPEs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159036PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe9011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

monitoring early
12
early intervention
12
at-risk students
12
risk substandard
12
substandard performance
12
students
11
advanced pharmacy
8
pharmacy practice
8
practice experiences
8
intervention process
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!