Purpose: Our goal was to develop brief pragmatic assessments of Behavioral Activation (BA) fidelity to support its dissemination in low-resource settings.

Methods: We used qualitative and quantitative methods across three investigations to develop pragmatic assessments rated from the perspective of therapists, patients, and observers: (1) we developed an initial comprehensive pool of 119 items and adapted/refined the item pool to 32 items through stakeholder focus groups and cognitive interviews; (2) independent blind judges rated each of items in the refined item pool on an early session of BA for 64 patients to support the selection of items based on predictive validity; and (3) we conducted a preliminary evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of the assessments of BA fidelity from the perspective of therapists and patients.

Results: The internal consistency reliability for the 10-item total score was .83 rated from the perspective of independent observers. The assessment was completed by patients following 90% of sessions and by clinicians following 93% of sessions. Items were rated high on overall satisfaction by both therapists (M = 4.6, SD = 0.89) and patients (M = 4.8, SD = 0.41).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that these brief assessments of BA fidelity are reliable, feasible, and acceptable to community stakeholders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628315PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-022-01219-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

behavioral activation
8
activation fidelity
8
develop pragmatic
8
pragmatic assessments
8
rated perspective
8
perspective therapists
8
item pool
8
assessments fidelity
8
assessments
5
items
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!