Background: Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (RCDP) is a rare autosomal recessive inherited subtype of a family of congenital anomalies known as chondrodysplasia calcificans punctate (CCP). Given their low rate of occurrence, these cases are highly challenging to diagnose, and because the presence of chondrodysplasia is an indication for legal abortion in Iran, such diagnosis is extremely critical.
Case Presentation: A 27-year-old white multipara was referred for obstetric ultrasonography at 17 weeks and 6 days of gestation because an ultrasonographic study performed at an outside institution revealed a short femur length. Given the patient's positive family history of chondrodysplasia, she underwent targeted sonography to check the anomaly of the bone and cartilage. The key finding in the sonography was short bones for gestational age.
Conclusion: The important clue in this finding was the patient's family history, which made the gynaecologist request an ultrasound to prevent the birth of a child with a congenital disorder. Genetic tests are usually performed on amniocentesis samples. Because the presence of chondrodysplasia is an indication for legal abortion in Iran, finally, the patient underwent legal abortion after amniocentesis and genetic tests.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10247581 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00737-5 | DOI Listing |
J Law Med
November 2024
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University.
This article examines whether the current termination laws of Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand align with the midwifery scope of practice. It begins with an introduction to termination of pregnancy from a health care perspective. An overview of previous and current legal frameworks in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand that impact upon the provision of termination of pregnancy health services is provided.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Law Med
November 2024
Barrister, Castan Chambers, Melbourne, Australia; Professor of Law and Professorial Fellow in Psychiatry, University of Melbourne; Honorary Professor of Forensic Medicine, Monash; Adjunct Professor, Southern Cross University.
This editorial reviews the changes over two decades in the United States and Australia in relation to the law governing access to drugs enabling medical termination of pregnancy. It also scrutinises three contentious decisions by the United States Supreme Court between 2022 and 2024 in relation to abortion. It argues that the receptive environment in the United States Supreme Court, as it is currently constituted, to challenges to the lawfulness of terminations of pregnancy and abortion medications is likely to inspire comparable challenges as part of the "Abortion Wars" in other countries, including Australia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Med Humanit
January 2025
S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abortion prohibitions in some states include carve-outs based on the medical condition of either the mother or the fetus. These carve-outs, however, may be couched in limiting language structured by legislators rather than in language understandable in the context of medical care. In circumstances where legislative bodies fail to adequately incorporate medical professionals in the drafting of medical laws, the resulting vagueness or ambiguity may lead to a lack of utility or viability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol India
December 2024
Bharati Vidyapeeth DTU Medical College, Pune, India.
The concept of foetal viability has evolved significantly and has been influenced by advancements in neonatal care and legal frameworks. This review explores the complexities of defining foetal viability in India's contemporary medical landscape, particularly in light of the recent extension of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act to 24 weeks. The article examines the confusion surrounding the classification of extreme preterm births, Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, and prenatal documentation during sonography.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObjectives: The 2022 US Supreme Court decision dramatically shifted the legal landscape in health care, leaving state legislatures to redefine the ethics of medical practice. As gold-standard medical procedures become banned and criminalized, physicians are facing heightened legal uncertainty and grappling with moral dilemmas of where and how to practice. This study aimed to quantitatively assess trends in legal concern among medical students and identify correlations with decision making regarding future medical training.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!