Background: Preventing HIV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) is a key element of the US Ending the HIV Epidemic strategy and includes both pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). While both lead to decreases in HIV transmission, MOUD has other social and health benefits; meanwhile, PrEP has additional HIV prevention advantages from sexual risk and the injection of stimulants. However, these medications are often prescribed in different settings and require multiple visits before initiation. Strategies to integrate these services (i.e., co-prescription) and offer same-day prescriptions may reduce demands on patients who could benefit from them.

Methods: Nominal group technique, a consensus method that rapidly generates and ranks responses, was used to ascertain barriers and solutions for same-day delivery of PrEP and MOUD as an integrated approach among PWID (n = 14) and clinical (n = 9) stakeholders. The qualitative portion of the discussion generated themes for analysis, and the ranks of the proposed barriers and solutions to the program are presented.

Results: The top three barriers among PWID to getting a same-day prescription for both PrEP and MOUD were (1) instability of insurance (e.g., insurance lapses); (2) access to a local prescriber; and (3) client-level implementation factors, such as lack of personal motivation. Among clinical stakeholders, the three greatest challenges were (1) time constraints on providers; (2) logistics (e.g., coordination between providers and labs); and (3) availability of providers who can prescribe both medications. Potential solutions identified by both stakeholders included pharmacy delivery of the medications, coordinated care between providers and health care systems (e.g., case management), and efficiencies in clinical care (e.g., clinical checklists), among others.

Conclusions: Implementing and sustaining a combined PrEP and MOUD strategy will require co-training providers on both medications while creating efficiencies in systems of care and innovations that encourage and retain PWID in care. Pilot testing the co-prescribing of PrEP and MOUD with quality performance improvement is a step toward new practice models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9616614PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00703-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prep moud
12
nominal group
8
group technique
8
preventing hiv
8
pre-exposure prophylaxis
8
medications opioid
8
opioid disorder
8
hiv transmission
8
barriers solutions
8
moud
6

Similar Publications

Background: Injection drug use (IDU) may lead to negative health outcomes and increased healthcare utilization. In US Veterans (USV) with opioid use disorder (OUD), there is sparse information about healthcare utilization, harm reduction prescription, and outcomes associated with IDU, including severe injection-related infections (SIRI). We assessed psychosocial factors, clinical outcomes, and harm reduction receipt in a cohort of USV with OUD, specifically focusing on persons who inject drugs (PWID).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for opioid overdose and infectious diseases including HIV. We piloted PARTNER UP, a telemedicine-based program to provide PWID with medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) with buprenorphine/naloxone (bup/nx) and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine through two syringe services programs (SSP) in North Carolina. We present overall results from this project, including participant retention rates and self-reported medication adherence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on a Comprehensive-TeleHarm Reduction (C-THR) intervention aimed at improving HIV prevention services for people who inject drugs (PWID) through syringe services programs (SSP) in Miami, Florida.
  • The CHARIOT trial will involve 350 PWID participants who will be randomly assigned to receive either C-THR or standard clinic referrals, with the goal of increasing engagement in HIV prevention methods like PrEP and medications for opioid use disorder.
  • The outcomes will be assessed over 12 months, focusing on factors such as engagement, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and barriers to implementing the C-THR intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • In Uganda, people who inject drugs (PWID) face significant barriers to healthcare and have a high risk of HIV, highlighting the need for integrated pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and harm reduction services to better meet their needs.* -
  • The study involved semi-structured interviews with 41 PWID in Kampala from May 2021 to March 2023, focusing on their experiences with harm reduction services and motivations for using them, employing purposive and snowball sampling methods.* -
  • Findings showed that while participants were aware of their HIV risk and knew about harm reduction services like sterile needle distribution, many struggled with treatment adherence, and awareness of PrEP was limited; however, they supported its integration into existing services
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low rates of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) prescribing contribute to the disproportionate burden of HIV in the United States. Among adolescent and young adults (AYA) with opioid use disorder, HIV testing and PrEP co-prescription rates are poorly characterized.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis involving deidentified data from Philadelphia's Medicaid beneficiaries ages 16-29 years who were prescribed medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) from 2015 to 2020 and continuously Medicaid-enrolled for ≥6 months prior to that prescription.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!