Introduction: Hepatobiliary malignancies present with advanced disease precluding upfront resection. Liver-directed therapy (LDT), particularly Y-90 radioembolization and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), has become increasingly utilized to facilitate attempt at oncologic resection. However, the safety profile of preoperative LDT is limited.

Methods: Retrospective review of the ACS NSQIP main and targeted hepatectomy registries for 2014-2016. Primary objective was evaluation of outcomes between preoperative LDT cases and those that received upfront resection.

Results: A total of 8923 cases met selection criteria. 192 cases (2.15%) received either Y-90 or TACE prior to hepatectomy. Multivariate analysis for all study patients revealed preoperative LDT significantly increased the risk of perioperative transfusion (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.445-3.328, P < 0.0001), sepsis (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.104-4.411, P = 0.022), and liver failure (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.562-4.747, P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis found for primary hepatobiliary malignancies LDT only increased the risk for liver failure. While for secondary hepatic tumors LDT significantly increased perioperative transfusion, sepsis, cardiac failure, renal failure, liver failure, and mortality. The complication profile also significantly increased with advanced T stage. Conversely, on propensity score matching preoperative LDT did not significantly increase perioperative complications.

Conclusion: Preoperative LDT has the potential to convert inoperable hepatic tumors into resectable disease but there is a general increased risk for significant postoperative complications, most notable liver failure. However, on controlled analysis preoperative LDT does not increase perioperative complications and should not be considered a contraindication to resection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative ldt
12
liver-directed therapy
8
preoperative
4
preoperative liver-directed
4
therapy prior
4
prior hepatic
4
hepatic resection
4
resection introduction
4
introduction hepatobiliary
4
hepatobiliary malignancies
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A study compared the clinical outcomes of lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) and RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative external rotation (ER).
  • The analysis showed that lateralized RSA alone led to better postoperative ER and Constant scores while having fewer complications compared to RSA with LDT.
  • Both procedures are effective for restoring ER, but lateralized RSA is preferred due to its lower risk of nerve injuries and dislocations, although LDT may still be suitable for select patients with severe ER loss.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The relative clinical advantages of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in direct comparison to RSA with latissimus dorsi and teres major (LD and TM) transfer for the treatment of combined loss of elevation and external rotation (CLEER) are not well understood. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the two surgeries with regards to (1) preoperative severity/indications, (2) range of motion (ROM) outcomes, (3) functional and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and (4) complications.

Methods: Following screening of three databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 13 studies were included, consisting of 91 and 115 shoulders having received RSA with LDT and with LD and TM, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) combined with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) to enhance external rotation, highlighting the significance of the tendon insertion site for optimal results.
  • It reviews 16 studies involving 264 patients, detailing various humeral insertion sites used for LDT and comparing clinical outcomes, including range of motion and Constant scores.
  • The findings show that the majority of insertion sites were at the greater tuberosity, with no significant differences in outcomes based on insertion location or whether LDT was performed alone or with teres major transfer, while common complications included dislocation and infection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) aims to improve motion, particularly external rotation (ER) and forward elevation (FE), in patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with combined motion loss, and this review summarizes evidence on its outcomes and complications.
  • A systematic review of 19 studies involving 258 RSAs showed significant improvements in ER and FE post-surgery, with mean ER changing from -12° to 25° and FE from 72° to 141°.
  • Complication rates were found to be 14.1%, including tendon tears and nerve-related issues, and no significant differences in outcomes were found between different implant designs or when a teres major transfer (TMT) was
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To assess the role of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDT) concomitant with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with external rotation (ER) deficit secondary to severe rotator cuff deficiency with and without glenohumeral arthritis.

Methods: Patients with a positive external lag sign and <10° of active external rotation (aER) treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution with a minimum 12-month follow-up were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Basic demographic information along with preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) measures, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores were obtained.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!