Background: Clinical trials are currently underway to investigate the efficacy of intra-articular administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to mitigate osteoarthritis (OA) progression in the knee. Although multiple MSC sources exist, studies have yet to determine whether differences in therapeutic efficacy exist between them.
Purpose: To compare the ability of intra-articularly injected adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) and amnion-derived MSCs (AM-MSCs) to mitigate the progression of knee OA in a small animal model of spontaneous OA, as well as to compare the therapeutic potential of MSCs in hyaluronic acid (HA) and in HA only with saline (OA) controls.
Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Injections of AD-MSCs or AM-MSCs suspended in HA or HA only were performed in the rear stifle joints of 3-month-old Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs (DHGPs). Repeat injections occurred at 2 and 4 months after the initial injection in each animal. Contralateral limbs received saline injections and served as untreated controls. Subsequently, joints were analyzed for osteoarthritic changes of the cartilage and subchondral bone via histologic and biochemical analyses. To evaluate MSC retention time in the joint space, DHGPs received a single intra-articular injection of fluorescently labeled AD-MSCs or AM-MSCs, and the fluorescence intensity was longitudinally tracked via an in vivo imaging system.
Results: No statistically significant differences in outcomes were found when comparing the ability of AD-MSCs and AM-MSCs to mitigate OA. However, the injection of AD-MSCs, AM-MSCs, and HA-only treatments more effectively mitigated cartilage damage compared with that of saline controls by demonstrating higher amounts of cartilage glycosaminoglycan content and improved histological proteoglycan scoring while reducing the percentage of osteophytes present.
Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of AD-MSCs, AM-MSCs, or HA only was able to similarly mitigate the progression of cartilage damage and reduce the percentage of osteophytes compared with that of saline controls in the DHGP. However, this study was unable to establish the superiority of AD-MSCs versus AM-MSCs as a treatment to mitigate spontaneous OA.
Clinical Relevance: MSCs demonstrate the ability to mitigate the progression of knee OA and thus may be used in a prophylactic approach to delay the need for end-stage treatment strategies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03635465221126683 | DOI Listing |
Am J Sports Med
December 2022
Laboratory of Orthopaedic Tissue Regeneration & Orthobiologics, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Background: Clinical trials are currently underway to investigate the efficacy of intra-articular administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) to mitigate osteoarthritis (OA) progression in the knee. Although multiple MSC sources exist, studies have yet to determine whether differences in therapeutic efficacy exist between them.
Purpose: To compare the ability of intra-articularly injected adipose-derived MSCs (AD-MSCs) and amnion-derived MSCs (AM-MSCs) to mitigate the progression of knee OA in a small animal model of spontaneous OA, as well as to compare the therapeutic potential of MSCs in hyaluronic acid (HA) and in HA only with saline (OA) controls.
J Orthop Res
November 2019
Department of Bioengineering, Laboratory of Orthopaedic Tissue Regeneration & Orthobiologics, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 29634.
Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) is a progressive condition marked by tissue destruction and inflammation. The therapeutic effector functions of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) makes them an attractive therapy for patients with IVDD. While several sources of MSCs exist, the optimal choice for use in the inflamed IVD remains a significant question.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
March 2019
School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528231, China.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most promising seed cells for cell therapy. Comparing the biological and transcriptome gene characteristics of MSCs from different sources provides an important basis for the screening of clinically used cells. The main purpose of this experiment was to establish methods for the isolation and culture of MSCs from five different canine sources, including adipose tissue, bone marrow, umbilical cord, amniotic membrane, and placenta, and compare biological and transcriptome characteristics of MSCs, in order to provide a basis for the clinical application of canine MSCs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol Res
November 2017
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Aim: The study was conducted to investigate secretory activity and define the paracrine potential of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord and amniotic membrane (UC-MSCs and AM-MSCs, respectively).
Methods: UC-MSCs (n = 6) were obtained from tissue explants using an adherent method after two weeks of incubation. AM-MSCs (n = 6) were obtained by digestion with tripsin and collagenase.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!