A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Using stacked deep learning models based on PET/CT images and clinical data to predict EGFR mutations in lung cancer. | LitMetric

Purpose: To determine whether stacked deep learning models based on PET/CT images and clinical data can help to predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung cancer.

Methods: We analyzed data from two public datasets of patients who underwent F-FDG PET/CT. Three PET deep learning ResNet models and one CT deep learning ResNet model were trained as low-level predictors based on PET and CT images, respectively. A high-level Support Vector Machine model (Stack PET/CT and Clinical model) was trained using the prediction results of the low-level predictors and clinical data. The clinical data included sex, age, smoking history, SUVmax and SUVmean of the lesion. Fivefold cross-validation was used in this study to validate the prediction performance of the models. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results: One hundred forty-seven patients were included in this study. Among them, 37/147 cases were EGFR mutations, and 110/147 cases were EGFR wild-type. The ROC analysis showed that the Stack PET/CT & Clinical model had the best performance (AUC = 0.85 ± 0.09), with 0.76, 0.85 and 0.83 in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, respectively. Three ResNet PET models had relatively higher AUCs (0.82 ± 0.07, 0.80 ± 0.08 and 0.79 ± 0.07) and outperformed the CT model (AUC = 0.58 ± 0.12).

Conclusion: Using stack generalization, the deep learning model was able to efficiently combine the anatomic and biological imaging information gathered from PET/CT images with clinical data. This stacked deep learning model showed a strong ability to predict mutations with high accuracy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9588917PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1041034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning
24
clinical data
20
stacked deep
12
pet/ct images
12
images clinical
12
egfr mutations
12
learning models
8
models based
8
based pet/ct
8
mutations lung
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!