A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Psychosocial and psychological interventions' effectiveness among nurses in intensive care units caring for pediatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The review assessed the effectiveness of psychosocial and psychological interventions for nurses in pediatric intensive care units, focusing on stress management.
  • A systematic literature search identified 1,630 studies, narrowing down to 4 that met criteria, with 3 studies used to estimate effect size; results indicated no significant overall effect on stress reduction using individual interventions.
  • However, group-based stress management programs showed a significant reduction in stress, highlighting the need for diverse psychosocial support interventions for nurses in critical care settings.

Article Abstract

Objective: This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of psychosocial and psychological interventions in nurses among intensive care units caring for pediatric patients.

Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL databases, using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. Study design, population characteristics, contents of the programs, measured outcomes, and results were systematically reviewed from 8 selected studies. To estimate the effect size, a meta-analysis of the studies was performed using the RevMan 5.3 program. The effect size used was the standardized mean difference.

Results: Of 1,630 studies identified, 4 met the inclusion criteria, and 3 studies were used to estimate the effect size of psychosocial and psychological interventions. The primary outcome variable of these studies was stress. The effect of the intervention program on stress was also found to have no effect in individual studies, and the overall effect size was not statistically significant (standardized mean difference = -0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.33, 0.20; Z = 0.48, = 0.630). However, according to the individual literature included in this study, after the stress management program was applied as a group, a significant stress reduction was shown in the experimental group ( = 0.021).

Conclusions: These results show that psychosocial and psychological interventions were effective in stress management by a group approach. Therefore, it is necessary to develop psychosocial support interventions for stress management of nurses among intensive care units caring for pediatric patients more diversely.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9589089PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.883230DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychosocial psychological
16
nurses intensive
12
intensive care
12
care units
12
units caring
12
caring pediatric
12
psychological interventions
12
stress management
12
pediatric patients
8
studies estimate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!