Clinical Characteristics and Current Practice of Endovascular Revascularization in Aorto-Iliac, Femoropopliteal and Infra-Popliteal Lower Extremity Artery Disease-Insights from the RECCORD Registry.

Background: Endovascular revascularization (EVR) is a pillar of therapeutic management in patients with symptomatic lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Due to lack of scientific evidence, the approach of EVR type and the devices used at the different anatomic vascular segments of the lower limbs vary substantially between operators and centers. We analyzed data from the RECcording COurses of vasculaR Diseases (RECCORD) registry to assess the current real-world EVR treatment patterns in relation to anatomic vascular segments in symptomatic LEAD patients in Germany.

Patients And Methods: RECCORD is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter, all-comers and entirely web-based registry platform. Baseline demographic and periprocedural data of patients undergoing EVR for symptomatic LEAD were assessed and performed EVRs were grouped according to the intervened anatomic vascular segment. We analyzed four EVR groups comprising either the aorto-iliac, femoropopliteal, or infrapopliteal segments (all these EVRs with or without a further intervention in another anatomic segment) or the infrapopliteal segment alone.

Results: A total of 2210 EVR segments (in 1639 patients) were analyzed. Of those 616 (27.9%) were aorto-iliacal, 1346 (60.9%) femoropopliteal, 248 (11.2%) infrapopliteal and 104 (4.7%) only infrapopliteal segments. Aorto-iliac EVR was associated with younger age, smoking, claudication and simple lesions, while the distal infrapopliteal EVRs were related to advanced age, diabetes, multiple comorbidities, limb threatening ischemia and complex lesions. The use of different EVR devices at the aorto-iliac, femoropopliteal, infrapopliteal and only infrapopliteal segments were: only ballon-angioplasty: 8.3%, 12.9%, 58.1% and 63.5%; stenting: 82.3%, 45.3%, 16.9% and 12.5%; drug-coated balloon: 11.2%, 55.0%, 19.4% and 19.2%.

Conclusion: The RECCORD registry data demonstrate that in LEAD clinical and lesion characteristics are related to anatomic vascular segments. Despite the clear relationship between vascular segments and the current use of device types, prospective, segment-specific clinical studies are warranted to establish a consistent, evidence-based path for EVR in LEAD.