AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared the effects of adalimumab originator and its biosimilar in patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) across 14 Italian sites.
  • Researchers measured treatment ineffectiveness using the Hurley score and analyzed both non-switchers and switchers between the two medications.
  • Findings indicated that patients taking the biosimilar experienced greater treatment ineffectiveness compared to those on the originator, and switching treatments may increase the risk of ineffectiveness without guaranteeing positive results when switching back.

Article Abstract

This study aimed to compare adalimumab originator vs. biosimilar in HS patients, and to evaluate the effect of a switch to a biosimilar, or a switch back to the originator, in terms of treatment ineffectiveness. Patients with a diagnosis of HS were enrolled from 14 Italian sites. Treatment ineffectiveness was measured using Hurley score. The major analyses were 1) comparison between the two treatment groups (non-switcher analysis), and 2) the cross-over trend of Hurley score between treatment switchers (switcher analysis). Cox and Poisson regression models were used to compare the treatment ineffectiveness between groups. A total of 326 patients were divided into four groups: 171 (52.5%) taking originator; 61 (18.7%) patients taking biosimilar; 66 (20.2%) switchers; 28 (8.6%) switchers from originator to biosimilar and switched. A greater loss of efficacy was observed in the group allocated to the biosimilar than the originator group. The switcher analysis showed an effectiveness loss in the biosimilar compared to the originator. These results seem to indicate that a switch from one drug to the other may lead to a greater risk of inefficacy. A return to the previous treatment also does not ensure efficaciousness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9599334PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102522DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

originator biosimilar
12
treatment ineffectiveness
12
adalimumab originator
8
hurley score
8
switcher analysis
8
biosimilar
7
originator
6
treatment
6
biosimilar hidradenitis
4
hidradenitis suppurativa
4

Similar Publications

Assessing Protein Content and Dimer Formation in the Bevacizumab Reference Product and Biosimilar Versions Marketed in Spain.

Pharmaceutics

November 2024

Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, Avda. Fco. Sánchez, s/n, 38200 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.

Background: The manufacture of biologics is a complex, controlled, and reproducible process that results in a product that meets specifications. This should be based on data from batches used to demonstrate manufacturing consistency. Ten batches of originator product (Avastin) were analyzed over a 10-year period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The paper reviews various cost containment policies aimed at controlling pharmaceutical spending by either regulating the industry or influencing consumer demand.
  • A narrative literature review highlights that governments have adopted diverse strategies like cost-sharing, value-based pricing, and the promotion of generics, but their effectiveness varies between healthcare systems and can negatively affect patients.
  • The conclusion emphasizes the need for thorough evaluation of these policies to ensure their success, as many lack strong evidence of cost-effectiveness and suggest that further research is essential to create tailored solutions that maintain affordability, fairness, and sustainability in healthcare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Biologics are substantial in the treatment of different diseases; however, they can burden the healthcare systems due to their high cost. Biosimilars can help healthcare systems keep their financial sustainability and patients access to biological therapies. The research objective is to formulate a framework for integrating biosimilars in the private healthcare sector of the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hum Reprod

December 2024

Unit for Human Reproduction, 1st Dept of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Study Question: Is the probability of pregnancy different between women using biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART?

Summary Answer: Meta-analysis of eight randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggests that live birth, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates are significantly lower with biosimilars of follitropin alfa compared to the originator.

What Is Known Already: All biosimilars of follitropin alfa have received regulatory approval by demonstrating non-inferiority in the number of retrieved oocytes compared to the originator. Nevertheless, the most clinically relevant outcome in ART for both clinicians and patients is live birth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aseptic abscesses syndrome is a rare but increasingly recognized disease that falls within the spectrum of autoinflammatory disorders. Here, we describe the case of a patient who presented with abdominal pain and fever, along with multiple abdominal and extra-abdominal abscesses, in the absence of underlying hematologic, autoimmune, infectious, or neoplastic conditions. Initially, the patient responded to glucocorticoids, but experienced several flares upon discontinuation, leading to the initiation of treatment with a TNFα inhibitor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!