AI Article Synopsis

  • Inbreeding depression negatively affects the fitness, health, and productivity of animal populations, with more recent inbreeding being particularly harmful compared to older inbreeding due to reduced frequency of harmful alleles over time.
  • The research focused on two distinct lines of rabbits, the Caldes line (growth traits) and the Prat line (prolificacy traits), analyzing the impact of different types of inbreeding on various growth and reproduction metrics.
  • Results indicated significant inbreeding depression across all evaluated traits in both rabbit lines, highlighting the importance of assessing inbreeding effects to understand and potentially counteract the implications for animal breeding programs.

Article Abstract

Inbreeding depression in closed populations impairs animal fitness, health, and productivity. However, not all inbreeding is expected to be equally damaging. Recent inbreeding is thought to be more harmful than ancient inbreeding because selection decreases the frequency of unfavourable alleles with time. Accordingly, selection efficiency is improved by inbreeding in a process called purging. This research aimed to quantify inbreeding depression on growth and prolificacy traits in two lines of rabbits selected for just one growth (Caldes line) or prolificacy (Prat line) trait, and also to find some evidence of purging of deleterious alleles by selection. Caldes line comprised 51 generations and 124,371 animals in the pedigree. Prat line comprised 34 generations and 161,039 animals in the pedigree. The effects of old, intermediate, and new inbreeding (Fold, Fint, and Fnew), as well as total cumulated classical inbreeding (F) and 3 measurements of ancestral inbreeding (AHC, Fa.K, and Fa.B) were estimated for average daily gain (ADG), slaughter weight (SW), weaning weight (WW), born alive (BA), the total number of kits (NT), and the number of weaned kits (NW). There was a clear inbreeding depression for all growth and prolificacy traits in the Caldes line (-7.19 g/d, -0.45 kg, -0.25 kg, -6 kits, -4 kits, and -4 kits per unit of increase in F for ADG, SW, WW, BA, NT, and NW, respectively) and also in Prat line (-7.48 g/d, -0.31 kg, -0.11 kg, -4 kits, -5 kits, and -4 kits per unit of increase in F for ADG, SW, WW, BA, NT, and NW, respectively). The inbreeding partition appears to be a reliable alternative for assessing inbreeding depression and purging. Thus, for example, in the Caldes line and for ADG the regression coefficients were -7.61, -5.41, and 7.76 g/d per unit of increase in Fnew, Fint, and Fold, respectively. In addition, AHC and Fa.B may provide more accurate evidence of purging than Fa.K. This study confirms the existence of inbreeding depression for growth and prolificacy traits in both lines of rabbits and shows evidence of purging of deleterious recessive alleles involved both in growth and prolificacy, independently of the selection criteria established in the line.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12745DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inbreeding depression
24
growth prolificacy
20
depression growth
16
prolificacy traits
16
kits kits
16
inbreeding
14
traits lines
12
evidence purging
12
unit increase
12
lines rabbits
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!