Variability in Ethics Review for Multicenter Protocols in Buenos Aires, Argentina. An Observational Study.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics

Comité Central de Ética en Investigación, Ministerio de Salud del Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Published: April 2023

It has been reported that significant variability in the ethics review process affects multisite studies. We analyzed 1,305 applications for multicenter studies (409 unique protocols), from 1 January 2020 to 20 September 2021. We examined the variability in the times to approval and the first observation and the variation in the level of risk assigned. The median [IQR] variabilities were 42.19 [15.23-82.36] days and 8.00 [3.12-16.68] days, for the times to approval and to the first observation, respectively. There was disagreement in the level of risk assigned by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) in 24.0% of cases. Independent predictors of variability included the number of REC members. In our study, we found substantial variability in the ethics review process among health research protocols. Also, we describe methods to readily measure the delays and the variations in the ethics review process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15562646221134620DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ethics review
16
variability ethics
12
review process
12
times approval
8
approval observation
8
level risk
8
risk assigned
8
variability
5
review
4
review multicenter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!