Importance: Robotic assistance in pelvic organ prolapse surgery can improve surgeon ergonomics and instrument dexterity compared with traditional laparoscopy but at increased costs.
Objective: To compare total costs for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) between two robotic platforms at an academic medical center.
Methods: Retrospective cohort of Senhance (Ascensus) RSC between 1/1/2019 and 6/30/21 who were matched 2:1 with DaVinci (Intuitive) RSC. Primary outcome was total costs to hospital system; secondarily we evaluated cost sub-categories. Purchase costs of the robotic systems were not included. T-test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests were used. A multivariable linear regression was performed to model total costs adjusting for potential confounders.
Results: The matched cohort included 75 subjects. The 25 Senhance and 50 DaVinci cases were similar overall, with mean age 60.5 ± 9.7, BMI 27.9 ± 4.7, and parity 2.5 ± 1.0. Majority were white (97.3%) and postmenopausal (86.5%) with predominantly stage III prolapse (64.9%). Senhance cases had longer OR times (Δ = 32.1 min, p = 0.01). There were no differences in concomitant procedures, intraoperative complications, or short-term postoperative complications between platforms (all p > 0.05). On univariable analysis, costs were similar (Senhance $5368.31 ± 1486.89, DaVinci $5741.76 ± 1197.20, p = 0.29). Cost subcategories (medications, supplies, etc.) were also similar (all p > 0.05). On multivariable linear regression, total cost was $908.33 lower for Senhance (p = 0.01) when adjusting for operative time, estimated blood loss, concomitant mid-urethral sling, and use of the GelPoint mini port system.
Conclusions: Despite longer operating times, total cost of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy was significantly lower when using the Senhance compared to the DaVinci system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05391-3 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
No Difference in Prolapse Recurrence Rates Between Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Long-Term Comparison.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Drs. Zhang, Jiang, Mao, Bai, Tian, and Guo), The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. Electronic address:
Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Tertiary referral center in China.
Application of CUSUM analysis in assessing learning curves in robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy performed by experienced gynecologist.
BMC Surg
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, 892, Dongnam-ro, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-727, Korea.
Article Synopsis
- The study evaluated the learning curve for robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy using CUSUM analysis to understand the surgeon's progress based on operation time, complications, and conversion rates to open surgery.
- A total of 50 surgeries performed by one experienced gynecologist were analyzed, identifying key breakpoints in the learning phases at approximately case 9 for proficiency and case 35 for competency.
- Results indicated that the surgeon faced no complications or need for conversion to open laparotomy throughout the study period, demonstrating successful learning and skill acquisition without any adverse outcomes.
Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis.
Int Urogynecol J
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liège, Hospital La Citadelle, Boulevard du 12 e de Ligne, n°1, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Article Synopsis
- Minimally invasive abdominal sacrocolpopexy (SC) is the top method for treating symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP), with robot-assisted laparoscopy (RSC) being compared to traditional laparoscopy (LSC) in this study.
- A retrospective analysis of 208 patients showed no significant differences between the two surgical techniques in terms of outcomes like operative time and complications, although RSC had a trend toward treating patients with a higher body mass index.
- While RSC did not prove to be superior to LSC, both techniques had shorter operative times than earlier literature and RSC's efficiency may allow for more surgeries to be completed in a day.
Gender Differences in the Adoption and Utilization of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Among Practicing Urologists: A Study of American Board of Urology Case Logs From 2012-2022.
Urology
October 2024
Minimally Invasive Urology Institute, The Miriam Hospital; The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to analyze how the gender of urologic surgeons affects their participation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RALS) from 2012 to 2022 using surgical case logs.
- Results showed that women performed only 10.8% of all procedures and 9.02% of robotic cases, with the highest involvement in sacrocolpopexies.
- The findings suggest significant gender disparities in RALS participation, highlighting the need for equitable training opportunities and further research into factors like mentorship and practice settings.
Bladder Compliance Dynamics of Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
December 2024
Mackay Medical College, New Taipei, Institute of Translational Medicine and New Drug Development (Dr. Lin); College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine (Dr. Lin); College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, and Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics (Dr. Lin), National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.. Electronic address:
Study Objective: Although mean/static compliance of bladder filling can be readily assayed via cystometry, a protocol measuring compliance dynamics at a specific stage of bladder filling has not been established in human patients. For patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the objective benefits of robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSCP) surgical intervention for restoring bladder functions, primarily urine storage, have yet to be established. Also, bladder compliance is a viscoelastic parameter that crucially defines the storage function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!