Background: The tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often chosen to maximize coverage of the tibial cut, which can result in excessive internal rotation of the component. Optimal rotational alignment may require a smaller baseplate with suboptimal coverage that could threaten fixation. We asked: "does undersizing the tibial component of a cementless TKA to gain external rotation increase the risk of bone failure?"
Methods: We developed computational finite element (FE) analysis models from the computed tomography (CT) scans of 12 patients scheduled for primary TKA. The models were implanted with a cementless tibial baseplate that maximized coverage and one or two sizes smaller and externally rotated by 5°. We calculated the risk of bone collapse under loads representative of stair ascent.
Results: Undersizing the implant increased the area at risk of collapse for eight patients. However, the area at risk of collapse for the undersized implant (range, 5.2%-16.4%) was no different (P = .24) to the optimally sized implant (range, 4.5%-17.9%). The bone at risk of collapse was concentrated along the posterior edge of the implant. The area at risk of collapse was not proportional to implant size, and for four subjects undersizing the implant actually decreased the area at risk of collapse.
Conclusion: While implants should maximize coverage of the tibial cut and seek support on dense bone, undersizing the tibial component to gain external rotation had minimal impact on the load transfer to the underlying bone. This FE analysis model of a cementless tibial baseplate may require further validation and additional studies to investigate the long-term biomechanical effects of undersizing the tibial baseplate. In conclusion, while surgeons should strive to use the appropriate tibial baseplate for each patient, our model identified only minor biomechanical consequences of undersizing the implant for the immediate postoperative bone-implant interaction and implant subsidence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.032 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Orthop Trauma
January 2025
Loyola University Health System, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, 2160 South First Avenue, 60153, Maywood, IL, USA.
Introduction: Mobile-bearing (MB) inserts, designed to minimize aseptic loosening and to reduce contact stresses leading to polyethylene wear, are an alternative to fixed-bearing (FB) inserts. Most studies have shown no significant difference between MB and FB constructs, and there is limited long-term data comparing the two constructs [1,2,3,4]. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing MB versus FB inserts on patients with minimum 20-year follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArthroplast Today
December 2024
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Background: Aseptic loosening is the most common aseptic failure modality following total knee arthroplasty. Recent literature suggests that the implant-cement interface is the "weak-link" in fixation and lipid contamination may drive this debonding pattern. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if the "double-butter" technique would significantly decrease lipid contamination of the tibial tray.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Orthop
December 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Background And Purpose: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an insert with ball-in-socket (BS) medial conformity (MC) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention restores kinematics closer to native than an insert with intermediate (I) MC. However, high medial conformity might compromise baseplate stability as indicated by maximum total point motion (MTPM). Using the BS MC insert with PCL retention, we aimed to determine whether (i) the baseplate is stable as indicated by mean MTPM < 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: The cementation technique is crucial for achieving adequate fixation and optimal survivorship in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The thickness of the cement at the tibial bone-implant surface may be related to aseptic tibial loosening. However, to date, no studies have demonstrated a direct association between cement thickness and rates of aseptic tibial loosening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Musculoskelet Disord
December 2024
Tarabichi Center for Joint Surgery, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Introduction: Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!