Objective: Irony as an indirect language with unpredictability consumes more cognitive resources, and is more difficult to understand than literal language. This study aims to explore the processing differences between irony and literal sentences using event-related potential (ERP) technology.
Materials And Methods: Three types of sentences were involved: sentences with predictable literal meaning, sentences with unpredictable literal meaning, and sentences with ironic meaning. The neural responses of the subjects were recorded when they read sentences.
Results: Compared to predictable literal meaning sentences, unpredictable literal meaning sentences and ironic meaning sentences elicited larger amplitude of N400 components. The difference was not significant between the latter two. In addition, there was no significant difference in P600 evoked by the three sentences.
Conclusion: In the initial stage of irony processing, the low predictability may result in the difficulty in semantic comprehension, in which the processing patterns of unpredictable and ironic sentences are rather close. In the later stage of processing, ironic integration is not harder compared to literal sentence integration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581322 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1019318 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Faces of different socio-cultural identities impact emotional meaning learning for L2 words.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Instituto Universitario de Neurociencia (IUNE), Universidad de La Laguna, La Laguna, Spain.
This study investigated how exposure to Caucasian and Chinese faces influences native Mandarin-Chinese speakers' learning of emotional meanings for English L2 words. Participants were presented with English pseudowords repeatedly paired with either Caucasian faces or Chinese faces showing emotions of disgust, sadness, or neutrality as a control baseline. Participants' learning was evaluated through both within-modality (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSyntactic development and its interplay with word processing and working memory in preschoolers' brain: An fNIRS longitudinal study.
Neuroimage
December 2024
School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address:
Understanding how children acquire syntactic structures from a limited set of grammatical rules and use them creatively to convey meaning has been a longstanding interest for scientific communities. Previous studies on syntactic development have revealed its close correlation with the development of vocabulary and working memory. Our study sought to elucidate how the relations between syntactic processing, word processing, and working memory were instantiated in the brain, and how earlier neural patterns might predict language abilities one year later.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF"ICODE Hip US Calculator": a mobile phone aid for screening with Graf's sonographic technique.
J Ultrason
December 2024
Paediatrics, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Roma, Italy.
Aim: Aiming to offer a diagnostic tool to aid examiners with correct hip typing and decision-making about patient management, members of the Board of the International Interdisciplinary Consensus Committee on DDH Evaluation (ICODE - https://www.icode.expert), introduced the cross-platform mobile application (Android and iOS) called "ICODE Hip US Calculator".
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.
Cereb Cortex
December 2024
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, Nijmegen 6525XD, The Netherlands.
The neural representations for compositional processing have so far been mostly studied during sentence comprehension. In an fMRI study of sentence production, we investigated the brain representations for compositional processing during speaking. We used a rapid serial visual presentation sentence recall paradigm to elicit sentence production from the conceptual memory of an event.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFConcurrent processing of the prosodic hierarchy is supported by cortical entrainment and phase-amplitude coupling.
Cereb Cortex
December 2024
Institute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution, University of Zurich, Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zürich, Switzerland.
Models of phonology posit a hierarchy of prosodic units that is relatively independent from syntactic structure, requiring its own parsing. It remains unexplored how this prosodic hierarchy is represented in the brain. We investigated this foundational question by means of an electroencephalography (EEG) study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!