Background: Maternal-fetal Rh-alloimmunization is a rare but potentially fatal event, most often caused by maternal exposure to D-antigen-presenting Rh-positive erythrocytes at the time of delivery. Prophylaxis with anti-D immune globulin is highly effective with a low side-effect profile and results in a dramatically decreased risk of alloimmunization. Postpartum anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis is recommended by national societies to reduce Rh-alloimmunization. We hypothesized that a small number of postpartum patients do not receive prophylaxis as indicated.  .

Objective: We investigated patients in 2 separate health systems that did not receive indicated prophylaxis and devised a suite of Electronic Health Record interventions to prevent future errors.

Study Design: We reviewed charts retrospectively from Electronic Health Record data of 2 urban academic health systems, the MetroHealth System and Oregon Health & Science University. We identified all Rh-negative postpartum patients and their infants delivering from 2014 to 2019. The primary outcome was the proportion of postpartum patients not receiving indicated anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis. Once cases of missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis were identified, we reviewed individual charts to determine the relevant clinical circumstances and potential causes for error.

Results: Of 29,801 deliveries over 5 years (15,444 at MetroHealth System and 14,357 at Oregon Health & Science University), there were 3087 Rh-negative postpartum patients, of whom 7 were alloimmunized and ineligible for prophylaxis. Anti-D immune globulin was indicated for 2162 (70.0%) women as they delivered an Rh-positive infant. A total of 37 indicated patients did not receive postpartum anti-D immune globulin. Twenty patients were offered prophylaxis and declined. We missed a total of 17 opportunities, thus our institutions appropriately offered indicated anti-D prophylaxis to 99.2% of patients over a period of 5 years. Of the 17 true misses, anti-D immune globulin was ordered for some patients, whereas others did not have an anti-D immune globulin order placed. A toolkit in the Electronic Health Record consisting of decision-support hard stops, automated documentation, and longitudinal reporting was implemented at the MetroHealth System in the year after its inception. The Toolkit identified and helped prevent 4 potential misses, resulting in a 100% anti-D prophylaxis rate at the MetroHealth System.

Conclusion: Given the serious nature of Rh-alloimmunization, we believe missed prophylaxis should be a never event. Through examination of our current processes, we identified areas of improvement and developed a Postpartum Anti-D Immune Globulin Prophylaxis Electronic Health Record Toolkit, which showed improvement in administration rates. Such a toolkit has the potential to identify patients appropriately and avoid missed anti-D immune globulin prophylaxis events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9563491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2021.100038DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-d immune
44
postpartum patients
20
electronic health
16
health record
16
missed anti-d
12
immune globulin
12
health systems
12
anti-d
12
metrohealth system
12
immune globulin prophylaxis
12

Similar Publications

Importance: Rhesus alloimmunization refers to the sensitization of an Rh D-negative mother after exposure to D-positive fetal red blood cells, which can lead to significant fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

Objective: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published international guidelines on the prevention of maternal alloimmunization.

Evidence Acquisition: A comparative review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the British Committee for Standards in Hematology, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada regarding the prevention of maternal Rh D alloimmunization was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Coombs test is important in hematology for detecting erythrocyte-bound IgG antibodies or in serm through agglutination methods, but its sensitivity and specificity are limited. Flow cytometry provides a more precise and sensitive alternative for quantitatively assessing RBC-bound IgG antibodies. This assessment is crucial for evaluating the risk of hemolytic reactions and ensuring safe transfusions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background and objective RhD variants show altered D antigen expression, affecting their serological detection. Proper identification is crucial due to potential anti-D antibody formation. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the frequency and characteristics of D variant cases encountered during RhD typing in both blood donors and recipients and the transfusion implications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Study on the Production of Anti-D and Anti-E Mixed Antibodies by Alloimmunization in RhD Variant Type33 Recipients].

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi

December 2024

Blood Group Reference Laboratory, Ningxia Blood Center, Yinchuan 750000, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.

Objective: To investigate the cause of the production of anti-D and anti-E mixed antibody in an RhD positive patient.

Methods: The ABO/Rh blood group typing and irregular antibody specificity were identified by conventional serological methods, the gene exon 1-10 and heterozygous analysis were performed by sequence-specific primer polymerase chain reaction (PCR-SSP), and the whole exon sequence was analyzed by first-generation sequencing.

Results: The patient's Rh blood group was weak D Type33, with the allele was , the patients was found to be heterozygous, with an Rh typing of Ccee, and the patient had developed anti-D combined with anti-E mixed antibodies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Distinguishing anti-D, anti- C, and anti-G specificities is particularly essential in antenatal cases to ensure proper patient management. The clinical management as well as Rh immune globulin (RhIG) prophylaxis depend on the accurate identification of these distinct antibodies. D- pregnant women with anti-G, but without anti-D, in their serum need RhIG prophylaxis at 28 weeks of gestation, at delivery if the infant is D+, and when clinically indicated to prevent the formation of anti-D and potential hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!