AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares the effectiveness and safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEVA) versus Lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • A total of 810 patients were analyzed, and after matching for comparable characteristics, the results showed no significant difference in objective response rates (44.8% for ATEZO/BEVA vs. 46.7% for LEN), but ATEZO/BEVA had better progression-free survival and overall survival rates.
  • ATEZO/BEVA also had lower rates of severe side effects like appetite loss and fatigue, but a higher rate of severe bleeding, and showed a better conversion

Article Abstract

Background: A comparison between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEVA) and lenvatinib (LEN) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and safety of ATEZO/BEVA and LEN as first-line therapies for HCC.

Patients And Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 810 patients with HCC who underwent ATEZO/BEVA (n = 186) or LEN (n = 624) as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 to March 2022 at 14 facilities. After propensity score matching, 304 patients (ATEZO/BEVA group: n = 152; LEN group: n = 152) were analyzed.

Results: After propensity score matching, although there was no significant difference in objective response rates (ORRs) between the ATEZO/BEVA and LEN groups (ORR 44.8% vs. 46.7%, p = 0.644), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) in the ATEZO/BEVA group were significantly higher than those in the LEN group (median PFS: 8.3 months vs. 6.0 months, p = 0.005; median OS: not reached vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.039). The rates of appetite loss, fatigue, and proteinuria of grade 3 or higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group were lower than those in the LEN group. However, the rate of bleeding of grade 3 or higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group was higher than that in the LEN group. The conversion rate was higher in the ATEZO/BEVA group than that in the LEN group (8.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: ATEZO/BEVA showed superiority to LEN in terms of prognosis and conversion rate as first-line therapy. Moreover, ATEZO/BEVA had a lower rate of severe adverse events, except for bleeding, than LEN.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9684293PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11523-022-00921-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atezo/beva group
20
len group
20
propensity score
12
score matching
12
higher atezo/beva
12
atezo/beva
11
len
11
group
10
atezolizumab bevacizumab
8
first-line therapy
8

Similar Publications

Background: Given the superior performance of various therapies over sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the absence of direct comparisons, it is crucial to explore the efficacy of these treatments in phase III randomized clinical trials.

Objectives: The goal is to identify which patients are most likely to benefit significantly from these emerging therapies, contributing to more personalized and informed clinical decision-making.

Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates how skeletal muscle changes during treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo + Beva) or lenvatinib (Len) relate to prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • It found that while the arm skeletal muscle index (SMI) decreased in patients receiving Len, it remained stable in those treated with Atezo + Beva.
  • Additionally, factors like arm SMI and extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) were significant indicators of progression-free survival in the Len group.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Few studies have reported the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atezo/Beva) treatment and the overall associated outcomes. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects and safety of RAM post-treatment with Atezo/Beva.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 46 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with RAM.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study compares the effectiveness and safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (ATEZO/BEVA) versus Lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • A total of 810 patients were analyzed, and after matching for comparable characteristics, the results showed no significant difference in objective response rates (44.8% for ATEZO/BEVA vs. 46.7% for LEN), but ATEZO/BEVA had better progression-free survival and overall survival rates.
  • ATEZO/BEVA also had lower rates of severe side effects like appetite loss and fatigue, but a higher rate of severe bleeding, and showed a better conversion
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between adverse events (AEs) and overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo/beva). This was a multicenter study in which 130 patients were enrolled. Hypertension and skin disorders had a significant correlation with longer survival (median survival time (MST): not reached vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!