A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Automated peritoneal dialysis in urgent-start dialysis ESRD patients: Safety and dialysis adequacy. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Recent evidence indicates that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) could serve as a viable alternative to hemodialysis (HD) for patients starting dialysis urgently.
  • A study involving 36 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients tracked complications, dialysis adequacy, and survival rates over a mean follow-up of 22 months, revealing that 30.6% faced dialysis-related complications, but most remained stable without needing significant interventions.
  • The findings suggest that with a high technique survival rate of 94.4% and a patient survival rate of 97.2%, APD is a safe and effective option for urgent-start dialysis in ESRD patients.

Article Abstract

Background: Recent evidence suggests that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) might be a feasible alternative to hemodialysis (HD) in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who had started APD as an urgent-start dialysis modality at a single center. Dialysis-related complications were recorded. Dialysis adequacy and electrolytes imbalance were compared between baseline, 14 and 42 days after catheter insertion. Technique survival and patient survival were also recorded.

Results: A total of 36 patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up duration was 22 months. During the follow-up, 11 PD patients (30.6%) developed dialysis-related complications. Only two patients (5.6%) required re-insertion and one patients (2.8%) transfer to HD. The 2-year technique survival rate and patient survival rate were 94.4% and 97.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: In considering safety and dialysis adequacy, APD could be a feasible dialysis modality for urgent-start dialysis in ESRD patients, using a standard procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.13943DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

urgent-start dialysis
12
esrd patients
12
dialysis adequacy
12
dialysis
9
automated peritoneal
8
peritoneal dialysis
8
dialysis esrd
8
safety dialysis
8
apd feasible
8
dialysis modality
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!