AI Article Synopsis
- Systematic reviews (SR) and systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMA) are vital for guiding clinical practice related to meningioma, yet their overall quality and reporting standards were found to be lacking.
- A search of eight databases identified 116 eligible SRs published between 1990 and 2020, with most studies scoring low on various quality assessment tools like PRISMA and AMSTAR 2.
- The findings suggest that improvements in methodological practices and adherence to established guidelines are necessary to enhance the validity and transparency of research in this area.
Article Abstract
Introduction: Systematic reviews (SR) and systematic reviews with meta-analysis (SRMA) can constitute the highest level of research evidence. Such evidence syntheses are relied upon heavily to inform the clinical knowledge base and to guide clinical practice for meningioma. This review evaluates the reporting and methodological quality of published meningioma evidence syntheses to date.
Methods: Eight electronic databases/registries were searched to identify eligible meningioma SRs with and without meta-analysis published between January 1990 and December 2020. Articles concerning spinal meningioma were excluded. Reporting and methodological quality were assessed against the following tools: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2), and Risk Of Bias in Systematic reviews (ROBIS).
Results: 116 SRs were identified, of which 57 were SRMAs (49.1%). The mean PRISMA score for SRMA was 20.9 out of 27 (SD 3.9, 77.0% PRISMA adherence) and for SR without meta-analysis was 13.8 out of 22 (SD 3.4, 63% PRISMA adherence). Thirty-eight studies (32.8%) achieved greater than 80% adherence to PRISMA. Methodological quality assessment against AMSTAR 2 revealed that 110 (94.8%) studies were of critically low quality. Only 21 studies (18.1%) were judged to have a low risk of bias against ROBIS.
Conclusion: The reporting and methodological quality of meningioma evidence syntheses was poor. Established guidelines and critical appraisal tools may be used as an adjunct to aid methodological conduct and reporting of such reviews, in order to improve the validity and transparency of research which may influence clinical practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2022.2115008 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Does Lifelong Exercise Counteract Low-Grade Inflammation Associated with Aging? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sports Med
January 2025
Medical Services, Real Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Background: Aging is associated with sustained low-grade inflammation, which has been linked to age-related diseases and mortality. Long-term exercise programs have been shown to be effective to for attenuating this process; however, subsequent detraining might negate some of these benefits. Master athletes, as a model of lifelong consistent exercise practice, have been suggested to present similar inflammatory profiles to untrained young adults.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEstimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment at short-term and long-term follow-ups: a proportional meta-analysis of observational studies.
Ann Intensive Care
January 2025
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, 3 Sassoon Road, Academic Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
Objective: Evidence of the overall estimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment among critically ill survivors discharged from intensive care units at short-term and long-term follow-ups is lacking. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of the post-intensive care cognitive impairment at time to < 1 month, 1 to 3 month(s), 4 to 6 months, 7-12 months, and > 12 months discharged from intensive care units.
Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO via ProQuest were searched from inception through July 2024.
Trigeminal neuralgia as a presentation of high cervical stenosis: a systematic review of the literature.
Eur Spine J
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1111 Mc Dowell Road, Phoenix, AZ, 85006, USA.
Purpose: An atypical presentation of cervical spondylopathy (CS), trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is attributable to the extension of trigeminal nuclei into the spinal cord and is frequently overlooked, leading to limited discussion with patients regarding potential anterior cervical surgery. Our systematic review assesses the effectiveness of cervical surgery for concurrent trigeminal neuralgia in cases of cervical spondylopathy.
Methods: A systematic review exploring cases of trigeminal neuralgia related to cervical spondylopathy was conducted searching on PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases for article in English.
Organ-specific malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection: epidemiological meta-analysis of incidence rates.
BJS Open
December 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Background: Acute type A aortic dissection is a life-threatening clinical emergency that necessitates immediate surgical intervention with an estimated mortality rate of approximately 1-2% per hour. When complicated by malperfusion, the perioperative mortality rate is reported to be increased by up to 39%. Malperfusion can affect many vascular beds with varying incidence and severity, resulting in coronary, cerebral, visceral, peripheral, renal or spinal malperfusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of Accuracy in Mandible-First and Maxilla-First Approaches in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
J Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
This meta-analysis compares the accuracy of mandible-first and maxilla-first approaches in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery to improve clinical decision-making. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to August 2024. The analysis included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies with a minimum of 10 patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!