A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A new bipolar device for sealing and cutting: and studies for performance evaluation. | LitMetric

Introduction: A novel multipurpose bipolar radiofrequency instrument, the Erbe Dissector (EDS), which simultaneously seals and cuts tissue, was developed. sealing rate and time, burst pressure, jaw temperature and thermal spread were studied in porcine renal arteries.

Material And Methods: , 13 surgical tasks were performed in two pigs: beside sealing rate and time, overall performance in sharp and blunt dissection, tissue sticking, hemostasis, precision, etc., were evaluated by four surgeons compared with ENSEAL G2 (EG2) using surveys on a Likert scale (1 = very poor; 5 = very good).

Results: , the EDS sealing rate was 91.7% (33/36 arteries) at an average sealing time of 2.1 s (range 1.7-2.8) and a burst pressure of 1040 ± 350 mmHg. The maximum jaw temperature was 87 ± 4 °C and the mean lateral thermal spread was 0.8 ± 0.2 mm. , the sealing rate for arteries and veins was 92.6% (50/54) and the median seal and cut time was 1.6 s (range: 1.3-2.9). The average EDS performance score across all tasks was 4.4 ± 0.6 Likert points. For five shared tasks, EDS was better than EG2 (4.4 ± 0.5 versus 3.4 ± 0.6 Likert points;  = 0.016).

Conclusions: EDS seals and cuts arteries and veins rapidly with good safety and user-friendliness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2022.2124523DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sealing rate
16
seals cuts
8
rate time
8
burst pressure
8
jaw temperature
8
thermal spread
8
arteries veins
8
likert points
8
sealing
6
eds
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!