Read-across, an alternative approach for hazard assessment, has been widely adopted when data are unavailable for chemicals of interest. Read-across is enabled via tools such as quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modeling. In this study, the current status of structure activity relationship (SAR)-based read-across applications in the Republic of Korea (ROK) was examined considering both chemical risk assessments and chemical registrations from different sectors, including regulatory agencies, industry, and academia. From the regulatory perspective, the Ministry of Environment (MOE) established the Act on Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals (AREC) in 2019 to enable registrants to submit alternative data such as information from read-across instead of data to support hazard assessment and determine chemical-specific risks. Further, the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) began to consider read-across approaches for establishing acceptable intake (AI) limits of impurities occurring during pharmaceutical manufacturing processes under the ICH M7 guideline. Although read-across has its advantages, this approach also has limitations including (1) lack of standardized criteria for regulatory acceptance, (2) inconsistencies in the robustness of scientific evidence, and (3) deficiencies in the objective reliability of read-across data. The application and acceptance rate of read-across may vary among regulatory agencies. Therefore, sufficient data need to be prepared to verify the hypothesis that structural similarities might lead to similarities in properties of substances (between source and target chemicals) prior to adopting a read-across approach. In some cases, additional tests may be required during the registration process to clarify long-term effects on human health or the environment for certain substances that are data deficient. To improve the quality of read-across data for regulatory acceptance, cooperative efforts from regulatory agencies, academia, and industry are needed to minimize limitations of read-across applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2022.2133033 | DOI Listing |
Part Fibre Toxicol
December 2024
Health Effects Laboratory, Department of Environmental Chemistry and Health Effects, NILU, 2007, Kjeller, Norway.
Background: Hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials (NMs) face challenges due to, among others, the numerous existing nanoforms, discordant data and conflicting results found in the literature, and specific challenges in the application of strategies such as grouping and read-across, emphasizing the need for New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to support Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA). Here these challenges are addressed in a study that couples physico-chemical characterization with in vitro investigations and in silico similarity analyses for nine nanoforms, having different chemical composition, sizes, aggregation states and shapes. For cytotoxicity assessment, three methods (Alamar Blue, Colony Forming Efficiency, and Electric Cell-Substrate Impedance Sensing) are applied in a cross-validation approach to support NAMs implementation into NGRA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChemosphere
December 2024
Drug Theoretics and Cheminformatics Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, 700032, India. Electronic address:
Regulatory authorities frequently need information on a chemical's capacity to produce acute systemic toxicity in humans. Due to concerns about animal welfare, human relevance, and reproducibility, numerous international initiatives have centered on finding a substitute for using animals in acute systemic lethality testing. These substitutes include the more current in-silico and in vitro techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegul Toxicol Pharmacol
December 2024
Lhasa Limited, Granary Wharf House, 2 Canal Wharf, Leeds, United Kingdom.
The carcinogenic potency categorisation approach (CPCA) has recently been introduced by health authorities. In this model, structural features from recent literature, industry proposals, and analyses performed by health authorities, provide a rapid assessment of the potential acceptable intake (AI) for a nitrosamine impurity. As with other screening regulatory values (such as the ICH M7 Threshold of Toxicological Concern), the CPCA is conservative and can be considered a de minimis risk management framework.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegul Toxicol Pharmacol
December 2024
GSK, Health Hazard Assessment, Environment Health Safety (EHS), Munich, Germany.
Availability of toxicological data for pharmaceutical intermediates (IMs) used in the manufacture of small molecules is often limited. Scarcity of data - in particular, repeat-dose toxicity (RDT) - renders the calculation of health-based exposure limits (HBELs) problematic. Establishment of HBELs, including occupational exposure limits (OELs) and permitted daily exposures (PDEs) facilitating worker and patient safety respectively, is however essential.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Divers
December 2024
Deparment of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar, 788011, Assam, India.
Leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease caused by various Leishmania species, poses a significant global health challenge, especially in resource-limited regions. Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) stands out among its severe manifestations, and current drug therapies have limitations, necessitating the exploration of new, cost-effective treatments. This study utilized a comprehensive computational workflow, integrating traditional 2D-QSAR, q-RASAR, and molecular docking to identify novel anti-leishmanial compounds, with a focus on Glycyl-tRNA Synthetase (LdGlyRS) as a promising drug target.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!