Background: Few studies have evaluated whether acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with relatively low blood pressure benefit from early ACEI/ARB use in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Objectives: This study evaluated the associations of ACEI/ARB use within 24 h of admission with in-hospital outcomes among AMI patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and undergoing PCI.
Methods: This study was based on the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-ACS project, a collaborative registry and quality improvement project of the American Heart Association and the Chinese Society of Cardiology. Between November 2014 and December 2019, a total of 94,623 patients with AMI were enrolled. Of them, 4,478 AMI patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and undergoing PCI but without clinically diagnosed cardiogenic shock at admission were included. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score-matching analysis were used to evaluate the association between early ACEI/ARB use and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), a combination of all-cause death, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest.
Results: Of AMI patients, 24.41% ( = 1,093) were prescribed ACEIs/ARBs within 24 h of admission. Patients with early ACEI/ARB use had a significantly lower rate of MACEs than those without ACEI/ARB use (1.67% vs. 3.66%, = 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, early ACEI/ARB use was associated with a 45% lower risk of MACEs (odds ratio: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.93; = 0.027). Further propensity score-matching analysis still showed that patients with early ACEI/ARB use had a lower rate of MACEs (1.96% vs. 3.93%, = 0.009).
Conclusion: This study found that among AMI patients with an admission SBP < 100 mmHg undergoing PCI, early ACEI/ARB use was associated with better in-hospital outcomes. Additional studies of the early use of ACEIs/ARBs in AMI patients with relatively low blood pressure are warranted.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558728 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1003442 | DOI Listing |
Int J Emerg Med
January 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, 475 Vine Street, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA.
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the most common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Our primary objective was to provide descriptive evidence regarding emergency department (ED) disposition of ACEI-induced angioedema patients. Our secondary objective was to evaluate unique patterns in those with ACEI-induced angioedema at a tertiary referral center, including demographics, details of those requiring intubation, length of inpatient stay, and allergy documentation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAims: Whether prior treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) modifies efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in patients with heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction (EF) >40% is unclear, thus Sac/Val according to ACEi/ARB status at baseline was assessed.
Methods And Results: This was a pre-specified analysis of Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF (PARAGLIDE-HF), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of Sac/Val versus valsartan, categorizing patients according to baseline ACEi/ARB status. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8.
Front Pharmacol
December 2024
Urinary Nephropathy Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Background: Data about the safety of ACEI/ARB use in early (<3 months) posttransplant period are restricted and remain controversial.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 31 November 2023, for studies to compare the safety (transplant outcomes and postoperative complications) of ACEI/ARB with non-ACEI/ARB (other antihypertensive medications) initiation in early post kidney transplant period.
Results: Of 1,247 citations identified, 13 eligible studies involving 1919 patients were enrolled for analyses.
Kidney Int Rep
November 2024
Department of Nephrology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Introduction: Evidence suggests a survival benefit from resuming angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) post acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to nonuse; however, the optimal timing and its impact on outcomes are unclear. The risks of earlier resumption, such as recurrent AKI or hyperkalemia, remain unexplored.
Methods: Using multiinstitutional electronic health records, we analyzed the relationship between 3 ACEI or ARB (ACEI/ARB) resumption timelines post-AKI (prior to discharge, 0-3 months, and 4-6 months postdischarge) and outcomes including all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), dialysis initiation or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), severe hyperkalemia, and recurrent AKI with hospitalization.
Ann Acad Med Singap
October 2024
National University Polyclinics, National University Health System, Singapore.
Introduction: Holistic Approach in Lowering and Tracking Chronic Kidney Disease (HALT-CKD) is a nationwide programme that was introduced in 2017 to combat CKD in Singapore. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of the HALT-CKD programme and identify factors influencing disease progression among early CKD patients.
Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult patients aged 21 to 80 with CKD stages G1-G3A, recruited from 5 Singapore polyclinics between 2017 and 2018.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!