Effects of hospitalist co-management on rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment in patients with vertebral compression fractures: Retrospective cohort study.

J Orthop Sci

Department of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.

Published: November 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Vertebral compression fractures in elderly patients are primarily caused by osteoporosis, and initiating treatment is crucial but occurs at low rates due to various systemic issues in care settings.
  • Hospitalists, who provide general inpatient care, show better adherence to treatment guidelines, suggesting that co-management of these patients could enhance treatment initiation.
  • A study found that patients under hospitalist co-management had a significantly higher rate of osteoporosis treatment initiation (45.2%) compared to those receiving conventional orthopedic care (3.6%), although there were no major differences in other clinical outcomes like hospital stay length or complications.

Article Abstract

Background: Vertebral compression fractures are common in elderly people and most are due to osteoporosis. Osteoporosis treatment is effective for secondary prophylaxis, so initiation is recommended. Despite the clear benefits, the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment is very low. It is reported to be due to several factors including insufficient systems-based approaches for hospitals and post-acute care. Hospitalists, who are physicians dedicated to the treatment of patients in hospital and whose activity is generalist rather than specialized, are reported to be associated with higher-quality inpatient care because of, among other things, closer adherence to guidelines. Co-management by hospitalists for patients with vertebral compression fractures has potential benefits towards improving the outcomes. We compared the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment for patients with vertebral compression fractures between conventional orthopedic surgeon-led care (conventional group) and hospitalist co-management care (co-management group).

Methods: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment and reasons for non-initiation of osteoporosis treatment. Other clinical indicators were also evaluated, including length of hospital stay, preventable complications during hospitalization, and rate of 30-day readmission.

Results: We identified 55 patients in the conventional group and 93 patients in the co-management group. The rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment was higher in the co-management group (45.2% vs. 3.6%, OR 21.5; 95%CI 5.12-192.0; P < 0.01). Most of the patients with non-initiation in the co-management group had reasons for it described in the medical records, but in the conventional group the reasons were unknown. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay, preventable complications during hospitalization, or 30-day readmission between the groups.

Conclusions: Hospitalist co-management of patients with vertebral compression fractures showed significantly higher rate of initiation of osteoporosis treatment than conventional orthopedic surgeon-led care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2022.09.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteoporosis treatment
28
rate initiation
20
initiation osteoporosis
20
vertebral compression
16
compression fractures
16
treatment patients
12
patients vertebral
12
hospitalist co-management
8
osteoporosis
8
treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!