Optimized tools and timing of response reassessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer.

Int J Colorectal Dis

Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fu-Cheng Road, Hai-Dian District, 100142, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Published: November 2022

Purpose: Reassessment tools of response to long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment (nCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are important in predicting complete response (CR) and thus deciding whether a wait-and-watch strategy can be implemented in these patients. Choosing which routine reassessment tools are optimal and when to use them is still unclear and will be researched in the study.

Methods: Altogether, 250 patients with LARC who received nCRT from 2013 to 2021 and were followed up were retrospectively reviewed. Common reassessment tools of response included digital rectal examination (DRE), clinical examination and symptoms, endoscopy, biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood biomarkers.

Results: Overall, 27.20% (68/250) patients had a complete response and 72.80% (182/250) did not. The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy showed the best performance in terms of accuracy of 74% and area under the curve (AUC, 0.714, 95% CI 0.546-0.882). Reassessing through DRE and presence of symptoms failed to improve the efficacy of response reassessment. After 100 days, biopsy as an assessment tool would obtain a substantial rise in accuracy from 51.28 to 100% (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: The combination of MRI, endoscopy, and biopsy is suitable as the reassessment tool of response for applying a wait-and-watch strategy after long-course nCRT in patients with LARC. The accuracy of biopsy as reassessment tools would be improved if they were used over 100 days after nCRT in patients with rectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9569175PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04268-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reassessment tools
16
rectal cancer
12
ncrt patients
12
endoscopy biopsy
12
response reassessment
8
neoadjuvant chemoradiation
8
tools response
8
complete response
8
wait-and-watch strategy
8
patients larc
8

Similar Publications

How can we remove erroneous penicillin allergy labels?

Evid Based Dent

January 2025

Public Health Directorate, NHS Lanarkshire, Kirklands, Fallside Road, Bothwell, G71 8BB, UK.

Objectives: To evaluate the use of the Penicillin Allergy Reassessment for Treatment Improvement (PARTI) tool in supporting appropriate penicillin allergy labelling in dental practices.

Design: Parallel mixed methods study.

Methods: Focus groups of patients with documented penicillin allergies and healthcare worker targeted questionnaires were used in gathering feedback on the PARTI tool's design and functionality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) have positioned whole exome sequencing (WES) as an efficient first-tier method in genetic diagnosis. However, despite the diagnostic yield of 35%-50% in intellectual disability (ID) many patients still remain undiagnosed due to inherent limitations and bioinformatic short-comings. In this study, we reanalyzed WES data from 159 Iranian families showing recessively inherited ID.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the inter-observer variability in assessing the optic disc in fundus photographs and its implications for establishing ground truth in AI research.

Methods: Seventy subjects were screened during a screening campaign. Fundus photographs were classified into normal (NL) or abnormal (GS: glaucoma and glaucoma suspects) by two masked glaucoma specialists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Supporting teams with designing for dissemination and sustainability: the design, development, and usability of a digital interactive platform.

Implement Sci

December 2024

Division of General Internal Medicine, Colorado Clinical & Translational Sciences Institute, and the Adult & Child Center for Outcomes Research & Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 1890 N. Revere Ct., Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Background: Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability (D4DS) principles and methods can support the development of research products (interventions, tools, findings) that match well with the needs and context of the intended audience and setting. D4DS principles and methods are not well-known or used during clinical and public health research; research teams would benefit from applying D4DS. This paper presents the development of a new digital platform for research teams to learn and apply a D4DS process to their work.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Numerous challenges exist in effectively bridging theory and practice in the teaching and assessment of clinical reasoning, despite an abundance of theoretical models. This study compares clinical reasoning practices and decisions between medical students and expert clinicians using a problem-solving framework from the learning sciences, which identifies clinical reasoning as distinct, observable actions in clinical case solving. We examined students at various training stages against expert clinicians to address the research question: How do expert clinicians and medical students differ in their practices and decisions during the diagnostic process?.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!