[Translated article] Comparison of three different minimally invasive intramedullary screw for proximal phalanx fractures. A biomechanical study.

Background And Objective: Phalangeal fractures are the most common hand fractures. In the last years, intramedullary compression screw (IMHCS) for instable transverse or short oblique proximal P1 fractures have been described. Although both anterograde (intraarticular or trans-articular) and retrograde IMHCS techniques have shown good results, no comparison between anterograde and retrograde screw in P1 fractures has been published. We sought to determine stability with retrograde IMHCS and anterograde IMHCS, both trans-articular and intra-articular technique, in a cadaveric transverse proximal P1 fracture model, at two different levels.

Material And Methods: We performed a biomechanical study in 30 fresh-frozen human cadaveric P1 fracture model. Fracture was performed at 9-mm from the metacarpo-phalangeal (MCP) joint in 15 specimens, whereas it was done at 15mm in the other 15. In turn, in each group, five fractures were stabilised with an anterograde intra-articular IMHCS, five with anterograde trans-articular IMHCS and other five with retrograde IMHCS.

Results: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in 9-mm P1 fractures (both trans- and intra-articular technique, 62.74N and 70.86N, respectively) was found to be more stable than retrograde IMHCS one (32.72N) (p=0.022). Otherwise, retrograde IMHCS fixation was found to be more stable in more distal P1 fractures (90.52N retrograde vs. 57.64N trans-articular vs. 42.92N intra-articular; p=0.20).

Conclusions: Anterograde IMHCS fixation in proximal transverse P1 bone cut in a cadaveric model provides more stability than retrograde IMHCS, while retrograde screw provides more stability when the bone cut is located more distal.