Background: Osimertinib is a recently approved third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR-T790M resistance mutations. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials And Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled studies that reported the efficacy and safety of osimertinib versus other treatments (chemotherapy, other EGFR-TKIs, etc.) in treating EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The measured effects included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and overall survival (OS). Additional outcome was the incidence of adverse event. Relative risk (RR) for incidence and hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes were pooled.

Results: Seven studies containing 3335 participants were finally included. Osimertinib tended to improve ORR and DCR (RRs >1) as compared with other treatments. Osimertinib was also a significant protective factor for PFS, CNS-PFS, and OS (HRs <1 and  < .05). Osimertinib showed similar advantages in improving tumor response and patient survival when used as first-line, second-line, and third-line/adjuvant therapy, respectively, as compared with other treatments (RRs >1 for ORR and DCR; HRs <1 for PFS, CNS-PFS, and OS). Osimertinib also had better therapeutic effects as compared with chemotherapy, other EGFR TKIs, docetaxel + bevacizumab, and placebo, respectively. The five most common adverse events with pooled incidence > 20% were diarrhea, rash, nail effects, dry skin, and stomatitis, yet the pooled incidence of serious adverse events was less than 2%.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that osimertinib has a positive effect in disease control and survival for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with acceptable toxicities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2132116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efficacy safety
12
safety osimertinib
12
osimertinib patients
8
patients egfr-mutated
8
egfr-mutated nsclc
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled studies
8
progression-free survival
8
osimertinib
6
nsclc systematic
4

Similar Publications

Objective: Focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening is safe and potentially beneficial in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) for the removal of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. However, the optimal BBB opening intervals and number of treatment sessions for clinical improvement remain undefined. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and benefits of repeated and more extensive BBB opening alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have poor outcomes. Gemcitabine + oxaliplatin (GemOx) with rituximab, a standard salvage therapy, yields complete response (CR) rates of approximately 30% and median overall survival (OS) of 10-13 months. Patients with refractory disease fare worse, with a CR rate of 7% for subsequent therapies and median OS of 6 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The global public health risk posed by Salmonella Kentucky (S. Kentucky) is rising, particularly due to the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance genes in human and animal populations. This serovar, widespread in Africa, has emerged as a notable cause of non-typhoidal gastroenteritis in humans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rationale: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bloodstream infections are a severe complication resulting from granulocyte deficiency following chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies and have a high mortality rate. However, reports of disseminated organ infections secondary to bloodstream infections are rare.

Patient Concerns And Diagnoses: We report 2 cases of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia who both developed CRKP bloodstream infections during the granulocyte deficiency stage following chemotherapy, with 1 case of secondary bacterial liver abscess and 1 case of secondary septic arthritis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin versus gliclazide, combined with metformin, in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and glucotoxicity.

Methods: In this single-center, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial, 129 treatment-naive patients with T2DM with glucotoxicity (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥ 200 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin ≥ 9.0%) were randomized to receive sitagliptin plus metformin (n = 66) or gliclazide plus metformin (n = 63) for 12 weeks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!