Effect of Fiber Type and Content on Surface Quality and Removal Mechanism of Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone in Ultra-Precision Grinding.

Polymers (Basel)

Key Laboratory for Precision and Non-Traditional Machining Technology of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.

Published: October 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • PEEK is a thermoplastic polymer known for strong mechanical properties, which can be enhanced by adding short fibers like carbon or glass.
  • The study investigates how different types and amounts of fibers affect the grinding performance and surface quality of fiber-reinforced PEEK materials.
  • Results indicate that carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK offers better surface quality due to easier ductile removal during grinding, while glass-fiber-reinforced PEEK tends to have poorer surface quality because of its tendency for brittle removal.

Article Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a promising thermo-plastic polymer material due to its excellent mechanical properties. To further improve the mechanical properties of PEEK, different kinds of short fibers are added into the PEEK matrix. The grinding machinability of short-fiber-reinforced PEEK varies with the effect of fiber type and content. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the surface quality and removal mechanism of fiber-reinforced PEEK in ultra-precision grinding. In this paper, different fiber types and mass fractions of short-fiber-reinforced PEEK, including carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (CF/PEEK) and glass-fiber-reinforced PEEK (GF/PEEK), are employed. The grinding machinability of short-fiber-reinforced PEEK was investigated using grinding experiments with grinding wheels of different grit sizes. The effects of the fiber type and mass fraction on the surface quality and removal mechanism during grinding were discussed. The results showed that the brittle-ductile transition depth of carbon fiber was much larger than that of glass fiber, so it was easier to achieve ductile removal in grinding with the carbon fiber. Therefore, the ground surface roughness of CF/PEEK was smaller than that of GF/PEEK under the same grinding conditions. With the increase in carbon fiber mass fraction, the ground surface roughness of CF/PEEK decreased due to the higher hardness. The brittle-ductile transition depth of glass fiber was small, and it was easy to achieve brittle removal when grinding. When the glass fiber removal mode was brittle removal, the GF/PEEK surface roughness increased with the increase in glass fiber content.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9572041PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14194223DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glass fiber
16
fiber type
12
surface quality
12
quality removal
12
removal mechanism
12
short-fiber-reinforced peek
12
carbon fiber
12
surface roughness
12
fiber
11
grinding
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!