Antithrombotic therapy may affect outcomes in major trauma but its role is not fully understood. We aimed to investigate adverse outcomes among those with and without antithrombotic treatment in major trauma. This is a retrospective study conducted at the Emergency Department (ED) of the University Hospital of Genoa, a tertiary trauma center, including all major trauma between January 2019 and December 2020. Adverse outcomes were reviewed among those without antithrombotic treatment (Group 0), on antiplatelet treatment (Group 1), and on anticoagulant treatment (Group 2). We reviewed 349 electronic charts for full analysis. Group 0 were n = 310 (88.8%), Group 1 were n = 26 (7.4%), and Group 2 were n = 13 (3.7%). In-hospital death and ICU admission, respectively, were: n = 16 (5.6%) and n = 81 (26%) in Group 0, none and n = 6 (25%) in Group 1, and n = 2 (15.8%) and n = 4 (30.8%) in Group 2 ( = 0.123- = 0.874). Altered INR (OR 5.2) and increasing D-dimer levels (AUC: 0.81) correlated to increased mortality. Group 2 showed higher mortality than Group 0 and Group 1, however Group 2 had fewer active treatments. Of clotting factors, only altered INR and elevated D-dimer levels were significantly correlated to adverse outcomes. Anticoagulant but not antiplatelet treatment seems to produce the worst outcomes in major trauma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9573302PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195764DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major trauma
20
group
13
outcomes major
12
adverse outcomes
12
treatment group
12
antithrombotic therapy
8
therapy affect
8
affect outcomes
8
tertiary trauma
8
antithrombotic treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!