Studies on COVID-19 pandemic-associated changes in mortality following self-harm remain scarce and inconclusive. To compare mortality risks in individuals who had self-harmed to those for individuals who had not, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (Waves 1 and 2) in Wales, the United Kingdom, using population-based routinely collected data. We linked whole population health data to all-cause mortality following an episode of self-harm between April 2016 and March 2021. Propensity score matching, Cox regression, and difference-in-differences were applied to compute changes in excess mortality (as ratios of hazard ratios, RHRs) before and during the pandemic for individuals who self-harmed. The difference in mortality for individuals who self-harmed compared to those who did not widened during Wave 1 (RHR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.04-4.03) and Wave 2 (RHR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.12-4.29) from before the pandemic. Stratification by sex and age group produced no significant subgroup differences although risk for younger than 65 years group were higher. Limitations include small sample size and incomplete data on cause-specific deaths during the pandemic. Our results underscore continuous monitoring of mortality of individuals who self-harm and effective interventions to address any increases in mortality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999850 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000882 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Ment Health
November 2024
National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH), Centre for Mental Health and Safety, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Background: Self-harm is a major health issue resulting in high societal costs. Few psychological and psychosocial interventions have shown effectiveness in reducing repeat self-harm.
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of psychological and psychosocial interventions that have shown evidence of effectiveness in adults and CYP (children and young people) who have self-harmed.
BMJ Ment Health
October 2024
Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Background: A self-harm episode is a major risk factor for repeat self-harm. Existing tools to assess and predict repeat self-harm have major methodological limitations, and few are externally validated.
Objective: To develop and validate a risk assessment model of repeat self-harm up to 6 months after an episode of non-fatal self-harm that resulted in an emergency visit to hospital or specialised care.
Psychiatry Res
December 2024
Public Health Economics Group, Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, University of Exeter, UK.
Digital interventions can offer crises support although their cost-effectiveness is unknown. We undertook an economic evaluation alongside a two-arm, single blind, randomised controlled trial. 170 adolescents aged 12-17, receiving child and adolescent mental health care who had self-harmed ≥2 in the past 12 months were randomised to usual care with or without an app (BlueIce).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAust N Z J Psychiatry
November 2024
Department of Developmental Disability Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!