AI Article Synopsis

  • The manual segmentation of muscles in MRI is crucial for reconstructing muscle volumes, yet often takes a long time, leading to the exploration of faster (semi)automatic methods that still depend on manual input.
  • A study was conducted where a trained operator repeated manual segmentations of the iliopsoas and gluteus medius muscles on MRI scans of patients scheduled for hip replacement, comparing volume variance, shape, and surface similarity to assess repeatability.
  • Results indicated that manual segmentations are generally reliable with low volume variance and high shape similarity, but caution is needed when segmenting muscle extremities due to lower similarity scores.

Article Abstract

The manual segmentation of muscles on magnetic resonance images is the gold standard procedure to reconstruct muscle volumes from medical imaging data and extract critical information for clinical and research purposes. (Semi)automatic methods have been proposed to expedite the otherwise lengthy process. These, however, rely on manual segmentations. Nonetheless, the repeatability of manual muscle volume segmentations performed on clinical MRI data has not been thoroughly assessed. When conducted, volumetric assessments often disregard the hip muscles. Therefore, one trained operator performed repeated manual segmentations (n = 3) of the iliopsoas (n = 34) and gluteus medius (n = 40) muscles on coronal T1-weighted MRI scans, acquired on 1.5 T scanners on a clinical population of patients elected for hip replacement surgery. Reconstructed muscle volumes were divided in sub-volumes and compared in terms of volume variance (normalized variance of volumes - nVV), shape (Jaccard Index-JI) and surface similarity (maximal Hausdorff distance-HD), to quantify intra-operator repeatability. One-way repeated measures ANOVA (or equivalent) tests with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons were conducted to assess statistical significance. For both muscles, repeated manual segmentations were highly similar to one another (nVV: 2-6%, JI > 0.78, HD < 15 mm). However, shape and surface similarity were significantly lower when muscle extremities were included in the segmentations (e.g., iliopsoas: HD -12.06 to 14.42 mm, P < 0.05). Our findings show that the manual segmentation of hip muscle volumes on clinical MRI scans provides repeatable results over time. Nonetheless, extreme care should be taken in the segmentation of muscle extremities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984589PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00700-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

manual segmentations
16
intra-operator repeatability
8
repeatability manual
8
hip muscles
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance images
8
muscle volumes
8
repeated manual
8
manual
6
segmentations
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!