Osbjective: Several studies have shown that both microscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) and unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) ULBD are effective for treating lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). However, there are different viewpoints as to which surgical technique is superior. Therefore, this meta-analysis investigated the clinical efficacy and side effects of microscopic ULBD and UBE ULBD for treating LCS.

Methods: To identify relevant studies describing the clinical outcomes and complication rates of microscopic ULBD and UBE ULBD for LCS, several databases were systematically searched in the Internet. The visual analog scale score for back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index were used to assess clinical outcomes. Furthermore, data about perioperative outcomes and complications were documented.

Results: In total, six studies with 450 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The UBE ULBD was found to be superior to microscopic ULBD in terms of efficacy against early postoperative back and leg pain. However, there was no significant difference between the two procedures in terms of final clinical outcomes and complications. In addition, compared with microscopic ULBD, UBE ULBD was associated with a significant reduction in the length of hospital stay and C-reactive protein levels 2 days after surgery.

Conclusion: UBE ULBD and microscopic ULBD for the treatment of LCS were similar in terms of final clinical outcomes and complications. However, UBE ULBD has several advantages over microscopic ULBE, including a shorter hospital stay and faster alleviation of postoperative back and leg pain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537863PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002100DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ube ulbd
28
microscopic ulbd
20
clinical outcomes
16
ulbd
15
ulbd ube
12
leg pain
12
outcomes complications
12
microscopic
8
effects microscopic
8
microscopic unilateral
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Spinal stenosis is a prevalent condition; however, the optimal surgical treatment for central lumbar stenosis remains controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes and radiological parameters of 3 surgical.

Methods: unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression with unilateral biportal endoscopy (ULBD-UBE), conventional subtotal laminectomy (STL), and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study systematically assesses the learning curve of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic (UBE) techniques across various spinal surgeries, focusing on its influence on operative efficiency and complication rates to guide optimized training and practice.

Methods: Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified studies on UBE learning curves for patients aged 18 or older, comparing early and mastery phases. Two reviewers independently extracted data on surgery type, operative time, and complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • UBE-TLIF is a minimally invasive surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases, but it still carries some risk of nerve or dural injuries.
  • This study compares two groups of patients: one undergoing a modified technique involving en bloc resection of the ligamentum flavum, and the other with standard piecemeal resection.
  • Results showed that the modified approach had no nerve or dura injuries and similar clinical outcomes, suggesting it is a safe alternative for treating lumbar conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) is an essential neurosurgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. This technique offers significant advantages over traditional full laminectomy and spinal fusion fixation, providing surgeons with greater operational freedom and precision in decompression. The UBE-ULBD procedure stands out because of its distinct working and observation channels, which significantly augment the surgeon's maneuverability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Posterior ring apophyseal fracture (PRAF) is a rare injury in teens that can cause lower back pain and nerve issues, often due to sports or trauma.
  • A case study highlights a 13-year-old girl with PRAF and lumbar disc herniation after a sports injury, showcasing the diagnostic and surgical challenges.
  • She underwent a minimally invasive surgery and showed significant improvement in pain levels one month later, emphasizing the importance of proper imaging and treatment for similar injuries in adolescents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!